Osnovna (bazična) pedijatrijska kardiorespiratorna reanimacija - preporuke 2010

J. Drmončić Putica
J. Drmončić Putica

Published: 15.01.2014.

Volume 42, Issue 1 (2013)

pp. 67-72;

Abstract

Za razliku od adultnih osoba, kardijalni arest kod odojčadi i dece često nije rezultat primarno kardijalnog uzroka. Češće nastaje kao krajnji ishod progresivne respiratorne insuficijencije ili šoka, zbogčega se naziva i asfiksijskim arestom. Osnovna kardiopulmonalna (KPR) posle kardijalnog aresta mora započeti odmh. Brza i efektivna KPR udružena je sa uspešnim uspostavljanjem spontane cirkulacije i neurološki intaktnom preživljavanju dece sa kardijalnim arestom. Novembra 2010. godine Američka Kardiološka Asocijacija i Internacionalni konsenzus za KPR i Urgentnu kardiovaskularnu i kardiorespiratonu negu objavili su novi vodič za KPR sa izmenjenim preporukama, obeležavajući 50 godina moderne KPR.

Keywords

References

1.
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations for Pediatric and Neonatal Patients: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):955–77.
2.
Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, Edelson DP, Barry A, O’Hearn N, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2005;293(3):305–10.
3.
Berg MD, Schexnayder SM, Chameides L, Terry M, Donoghue A, Hickey RW, et al. Part 13: Pediatric Basic Life Support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(18_suppl_3):862–75.
4.
Clements F, McGowan J. Finger position for chest compressions in cardiac arrest in infants. Resuscitation. 2000;44(1):43–6.
5.
Dorfsman ML, Menegazzi JJ, Wadas RJ, Auble TE. Two-thumb vs. two-finger chest compression in an infant model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2000;7(10):1077–82.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by