Praxis Medica
Sign in
Issue image

More articles from Volume 49, Issue 1, 2020

Relationship between ACR and other determinants of microalbuminuria in T2DM patients

Uticaj porođajne mase i aktuelne težine deteta na nastanak prevremenog puberteta

Frequency and histological-cytological correlation of premalignant and malignant changes in the cervix in women of different ages

Errors and artifacts on radiographs

Strategije suočavanja sa anksioznošću u situaciji testiranja engleskog jezika kod studenata visokog i niskog samopoštovanja

Strategije suočavanja sa anksioznošću u situaciji testiranja engleskog jezika kod studenata visokog i niskog samopoštovanja

Marina Malobabić ,
Marina Malobabić
View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Ivana Nešić ,
Ivana Nešić
View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Vesna Jokanović
Vesna Jokanović
View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Published: 01.12.2019.

Volume 49, Issue 1 (2020)

pp. 23-27;

https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed2002023m

Abstract

Introduction: Different types of tests present a great part of the academic life, and the tests themselves are extremely stressful situations for most students. The question of strategies used for coping with anxiety in testing situations is raised by the anxiety experienced by students and the levels of their self-esteem during tests. Aim of the paper: The aim of the paper is to take into consideration language anxiety, self-esteem and social and demographic variables as predictors of active use of strategies for coping with the testing situation. Material and methodology: This research included 338 students from five faculties/colleges, with an average age of 21.82±2.561, who were administered the following scales: Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale, the Coping with the Testing Situation Scale and Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale. Results: The Subscale for Language Anxiety during Testing has the highest reversed predictive value (beta=-0.43, p<0.001) of coping strategies for the testing situation; older respondents have less expressed ability of coping with the testing (beta=-0.23, p<0.001), and the higher the level of fear from negative evaluation (beta=0.21, p<0.001), the more the respondents are coping with the testing situation. Conclusion: The higher the testing anxiety, the less will the students use coping strategies, and the older students cope less with stressful testing situations, but the greater the presence of a more expressed fear of inefficiency, the more will the respondents cope with the testing situation through various strategies.

References

1.
Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. 1965.
2.
Martín-Albo J, Núñez JL, Navarro JG, Grijalvo F. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Translation and Validation in University Students. Vol. 10, The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2007. p. 458–67.
3.
Brown JD. Self-esteem and self-evaluation: Feeling is believing. In 1993. p. 27–58.
4.
Rosenberg M, Schooler C, Schoenbach C, Rosenberg F. Global Self-Esteem and Specific Self-Esteem: Different Concepts, Different Outcomes. Vol. 60, American Sociological Review. 1995. p. 141.
5.
Graham S. Effective Language Learning: Positive Strategies for Advanced Level Language Learning Modern Languages in Practice. 1997.
6.
HORWITZ EK, HORWITZ MB, COPE J. Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety. Vol. 70, The Modern Language Journal. 1986. p. 125–32.
7.
Nešić I, Spasić-Stojković M. Insights from students’ language learning diaries. 2018. p. 135-154,.
8.
Young DJ. The Relationship Between Anxiety and Foreign Language Oral Proficiency Ratings. Vol. 19, Foreign Language Annals. 1986. p. 439–45.
9.
Hembree R. Correlates, Causes, Effects, and Treatment of Test Anxiety. Vol. 58, Review of Educational Research. 1988. p. 47–77.
10.
Sarason IG, Sarason BR. Test Anxiety. Handbook of Social and Evaluation Anxiety. 1990. p. 475–95.
11.
Kondo DS. Strategies for coping with test anxiety. Vol. 10, Anxiety, Stress &amp; Coping. 1997. p. 203–15.
12.
Lazarus RS i FS. Stress, appraisal, and coping. 1984.
13.
Kalebić-Maglica B. Uloga izražavanja emocija i suočavanja sa stresom vezanim uz školu u percepciji raspoloženja i tjelesnih simptoma adolescenata. Vol. 16. 2007. p. 1–26.
14.
Compas BE, Connor-Smith JK, Saltzman H, Thomsen AH, Wadsworth ME. Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Vol. 127, Psychological Bulletin. p. 87–127.
15.
Burić I, Sorić I, Penezić Z. Strategije emocionalne regulacije u ispitnim situacijama: Doprinosi osobina ličnosti, kognitivnih procjena i ispitnih emocija. Vol. 20. 2011. p. 277–98.
16.
Sorić I. Kauzalne atribucije i strategije suočavanja u školskoj situaciji ispitivanja znanja. In 1994.
17.
Sorić I. Usporedba osnovnih postavki Weinoreve i Lazarusove teorije emocija u školskoj situaciji ispitivanja znanja. In 1998.
18.
Sarid O, Anson O, Yaari A, Margalith M. Coping styles and changes in humoural reaction during academic stress. Vol. 9, Psychology, Health &amp; Medicine. 2004. p. 85–98.
19.
Rohrmann S, Netter P, Hennig J, Hodapp V. Repression-sensitization, gender, and discrepancies in psychobiological reactions to examination stress. Vol. 16, Anxiety, Stress &amp; Coping. 2003. p. 321–9.
20.
Blankstein KR, Flett GL, Watson MS. Coping and academic problem-solving ability in test anxiety. Vol. 48, Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1992. p. 37–46.
21.
Edwards JM, Trimble K. Anxiety, coping and academic performance. Vol. 5, Anxiety, Stress &amp; Coping. 1992. p. 337–50.
22.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Vol. 84, Psychological Review. p. 191–215.
23.
Juretić J. Socijalna i ispitna anksioznost te percepcija samoefikasnosti kao prediktori ishoda ispitne situacije. Vol. 17. 2008. p. 15–36.
24.
Pintrich P i S, D. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research & Applications. 1996.
25.
Pekrun R. The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Vol. 18, Educational Psychology Review. 2006. p. 315–41.
26.
Pekrun R, Goetz T, Titz W, Perry RP. Academic Emotions in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Vol. 37, Educational Psychologist. 2002. p. 91–105.
27.
Brković AD, Petrović-Bjekić D, Zlatić L. Students’ motivation for teaching courses. Vol. 31. 1998. p. 115–36.
28.
Carver CS, Scheier MF. Themes and issues in the self-regulation of behavior. Vol. 12. 1999. p. 1.
29.
Chang EC, Farrehi AS. Optimism/pessimism and information-processing styles: can their influences be distinguished in predicting psychological adjustment? Vol. 31, Personality and Individual Differences. 2001. p. 555–62.
30.
Leahy RL. Cognitive therapy techniques: A practitioner’s guide. 2003.
31.
Leary MR i K, R.M. Social Anxiety. 1995.
32.
Šimić K. Suočavanje studenata sa stresnim ispitnim situacijama. Vol. 14. 2017. p. 0–0.

Citation

Copyright

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by
DOAJ
Google Scholar
ERIHPLUS
MIAR I
Crossref