More articles from Volume 51, Issue 1, 2022
The impact of body weight on the secondary osification centers development and the term of closure of the anterior fontanelle in infants
Students' attitudes about the quality and effectiveness of online compared to traditional teaching of histology and embryology during the COVID-19 pandemic
Assessment of neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in patients with hashimoto's thyroiditis
Frequency of depression in patients affected by subclinical and clinical hypothyroidism: A cross-section study
Factors associated with involuntary hospitalization
Students' attitudes about the quality and effectiveness of online compared to traditional teaching of histology and embryology during the COVID-19 pandemic
,
Teodora Jorgaćević
,
Slađana Savić
,
Jelena Tomašević
,
Erdin Mehmedi
,
Milica Perić
Sanja Gašić
Abstract
References
1.
Matzavela V, Alepis E. M-learning in the COVID-19 era: physical vs digital class. Vol. 26, Education and Information Technologies. 2021. p. 7183–203.
2.
Sandhu P, de Wolf M. The impact of COVID-19 on the undergraduate medical curriculum. Vol. 25, Medical Education Online. 2020.
3.
Mukhtar K, Javed K, Arooj M, Sethi A. Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Vol. 36, Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.
4.
Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. Vol. 10, BMJ Open. 2020. p. e042378.
5.
Popovic N, Popovic T, Rovcanin Dragovic I, Cmiljanic O. A Moodle-based blended learning solution for physiology education in Montenegro: a case study. Vol. 42, Advances in Physiology Education. 2018. p. 111–7.
6.
Samaraee AA. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education. Vol. 81, British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2020. p. 1–4.
7.
Abbasi MS, Ahmed N, Sajjad B, Alshahrani A, Saeed S, Sarfaraz S, et al. E-Learning perception and satisfaction among health sciences students amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Vol. 67, Work. 2020. p. 549–56.
8.
Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Vol. 30, Medical Teacher. 2008. p. 455–73.
9.
Ray I, Agarwal V, Agarwal T, Pande A. Medical Student’s Perspective Regarding Undergraduate Surgical Education with Special Reference to Pandemic. Vol. 84, Indian Journal of Surgery. 2022. p. 104–8.
10.
Song Y, Wang S, Liu Y, Liu X, Peng A. Online education at the medical School of Tongji University during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Vol. 21, BMC Medical Education. 2021.
11.
Rogowska AM, Ochnik D, Kuśnierz C, Jakubiak M, Schütz A, Held MJ, et al. Satisfaction with life among university students from nine countries: Cross-national study during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Vol. 21, BMC Public Health. 2021.
12.
Chen T, Lucock M. The mental health of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey in the UK. Vol. 17, PLOS ONE. p. e0262562.
13.
Fatani TH. Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vol. 20, BMC Medical Education. 2020.
14.
Totlis T, Tishukov M, Piagkou M, Kostares M, Natsis K. Online educational methods vs. traditional teaching of anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vol. 54, Anatomy & Cell Biology. 2021. p. 332–9.
15.
Alsoufi A, Alsuyihili A, Msherghi A, Elhadi A, Atiyah H, Ashini A, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: Medical students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning. Vol. 15, PLOS ONE. p. e0242905.
16.
Gismalla MDA, Mohamed MS, Ibrahim OSO, Elhassan MMA, Mohamed MN. Medical students’ perception towards E-learning during COVID 19 pandemic in a high burden developing country. Vol. 21, BMC Medical Education. 2021.
17.
Bawa P. Retention in Online Courses. Vol. 6, SAGE Open. 2016. p. 215824401562177.
18.
Rossettini G, Geri T, Turolla A, Viceconti A, Scumà C, Mirandola M, et al. Online teaching in physiotherapy education during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: a retrospective case-control study on students’ satisfaction and performance. Vol. 21, BMC Medical Education. 2021.
19.
Elshami W, Taha MH, Abuzaid M, Saravanan C, Al Kawas S, Abdalla ME. Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Vol. 26, Medical Education Online. 2021.
20.
Abbasi S, Ayoob T, Malik A, Memon SI. Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during Covid-19 at a private medical college. Vol. 36, Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.
21.
Zhang Q, He YJ, Zhu YH, Dai MC, Pan MM, Wu JQ, et al. The evaluation of online course of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Medical Bachelor, Bachelor of Surgery international students during the COVID-19 epidemic period. Vol. 9, Integrative Medicine Research. 2020. p. 100449.
22.
Students’ Perception on Online Teaching and Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic in Medical Education. Vol. 16, Maedica - A Journal of Clinical Medicine.
23.
Kheng S. The challenges of upgrading from ISPO Category II level to Bachelor Degree level by distance education. Vol. 32, Prosthetics & Orthotics International. 2008. p. 299–312.
24.
Mahdy MAA, Sayed RKA. Evaluation of the online learning of veterinary anatomy education during the Covid‐19 pandemic lockdown in Egypt: Students’ perceptions. Vol. 15, Anatomical Sciences Education. 2022. p. 67–82.
25.
AlQhtani A, AlSwedan N, Almulhim A, Aladwan R, Alessa Y, AlQhtani K, et al. Online versus classroom teaching for medical students during COVID-19: measuring effectiveness and satisfaction. Vol. 21, BMC Medical Education. 2021.
26.
Ødegaard NB, Myrhaug HT, Dahl-Michelsen T, Røe Y. Digital learning designs in physiotherapy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 21, BMC Medical Education. 2021.
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
Google scholar:
See link
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
