QUALITY OF LIFE IN CORONARY PATIENTS AFTER CORONARY AND VALVULAR SURGERY

V. Perić ,
V. Perić

Internal clinic, Medical faculty , Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica

M. Borzanović ,
M. Borzanović

Institute for cardiovascular diseases "Dedinje" Serbia

S. Sovtić ,
S. Sovtić

Internal clinic, Medical faculty , Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica

A. Jovanović ,
A. Jovanović

Internal clinic, Medical faculty , Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica

R. Stolić ,
R. Stolić

Internal clinic, Medical faculty , Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica

S. Lazić ,
S. Lazić

Internal clinic, Medical faculty , Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica

M. Šipić ,
M. Šipić

Internal clinic, Medical faculty , Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica

V. Trajković
V. Trajković

Internal clinic, Medical faculty , Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica

Published: 01.01.2004.

Volume 32, Issue 1 (2004)

pp. 23-28;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed200401063P

Abstract

There are different reports regarding the characteristics of examined quality of life (QOL) in patients with combined coronary and valvular surgery. Objective was to compare the quality of life changes after isolated coronary and associated coronary and valvular surgery. From February to May 2002, we prospectively studied 243 consecutive patients, who underwent elective CABG. The Nottingham Health Profile Questionnaire part I (NHPpart I) was used as a model for QOL determination. NHPpart I contains 38 subjective statements divided into six sections: physical mobility (PM), social isolation (SI), emotional reaction (ER), energy (En), pain and sleep. The scores ranged from zero to 100, by adding the item weight, determined by Thurstone method of paired compares, to every positive answer. We distributed the questionnaire to all patients before and six months after CABG. Two hundred twenty six patients filled in the postoperative questionnaire. An isolated coronary heart disease was present in 218 patients (89.71%), and associated coronary and valvular disease in 25 patients (10.29%). Preoperatively, there is no difference in QOLamong the examined groups. After operation, quality of life was improved in 84.65% (171/202) of patients using coronary surgery and in 79.17% (19/24) of patients using combined (coronary and valvular) surgery. Quality of life was statistically improved in the first group of patients in all sections, and in the second group of patients in 4 sections (PM, En, pain and sleep) (p<0.05). There is no significant correlation between the quality of life changes after operation and the type of surgical procedure. By univariate and multivariate logistic regression, combined procedure distinguished as the independent predictor of QOL worsening in the ER section (p=0.012, OR=3.62, 95% CI 1.32-9.92). Six months after CABG quality of life was significant better in most of patients in both studied groups. Associated coronary and valvular surgical intervention distinguished as the independent predictor of quality of life worsening in the ER section.

Keywords

References

1.
Thulin LI. Quality of Life and Mechanical Heart Valve Sound. Cor Vasa. 31(2):134–8.
2.
Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J. The Nottingham Health Profile. In: Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. p. 165–9, 349–52.
3.
Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD. Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. Am J Cardiol. 54:908–13.
4.
Editorial: Quality of Life and Clinical Trials. Lancet. 346:1–2.
5.
Stamatović M, Jakovljević Đ, Legetić B. Zdravstvena zaštita i osiguranje. Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
6.
Deyo RA. The Quality of Life, Research and Care. Ann Int Med. 114:695–6.
7.
Wakita N, Kawanishi Y, Minami Y. Combined CABG and Valve Operation. J Cardiac Surg. 53(8):612–6.
8.
ACC/AHA Practice Guidelines: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG. J Am Coll Cardiol. 34:1262–347.
9.
Fruitman DS, MacDougall CE, Ross DB. Cardiac Surgery in Octogenarians: Can Elderly Patients Benefit? Quality of Life After Cardiac Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 68(6):2129–35.
10.
Shapira OM, Kelleher RM, Zelingher J. Prognosis and Quality of Life After Valve Surgery in Patients Older Than 75 Years. Chest. 112(4):885–94.
11.
Yamaguchi H, Yamauchi H, Yamada T. Quality of Life in Patients Over 70 Years of Age After Heart Valve Replacement. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 6(3):167–72.
12.
Perchinsky M, Henderson C, Jamieson WR. Quality of Life in Patients with Bioprostheses and Mechanical Prostheses. Evaluation of Cohorts of Patients Aged 51 to 65 Years at Implantation. Circulation. 98(19):81–6.
13.
Hunt SM. Nottingham Health Profile. In: Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. p. 165–9, 349–52.
14.
Podolec P, Pfitzner R, Wierzbicki K. The Quality of Life After Aortic Valve Replacement with Homografts or Prosthetic Valves. J Heart Valve Dis. 8(3):270–6.
15.
Chocron S, Etievent JP, Viel JF. Prospective Study of Quality of Life Before and After Open Heart Operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 61(1):153–7.
16.
Radovanović N, Jakovljević Đ, Potić Z. Quality of Life After Open Heart Surgery.
17.
Alonso J, Anto JM. Moreno C: Spanish Version of the Nottingham Health Profile: Translation and Preliminary Validity. Am J Public Health. 80:704–8.
18.
Condon S, Bucquet D. Adaptation en français du Nottingham Health Profile et caractéristiques opératoires de la version française. Inserm. U 164.
19.
Kind P, Gudex CM. Measuring Health Status in the Community: A Comparison of Methods. J Epidemiol Community Health. 48:86–91.
20.
Gandjour A, Lauterbach KW. Review of Quality of Life Evaluation in Patients with Isolated Coronary Artery Disease and Patients with Associated Valvular Disease. Pharmacoeconomics. 16(2):141–52.
21.
Pocock SJ. A Perspective on the Role of Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 12:257–65.
22.
Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Life Measurements. JAMA. 272:619–26.
23.
Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Perceived Health: Age and Sex Comparisons in a Community. J Epidemiol Community Health. 38:156–60.
24.
McKenna SP, Hunt SM, McEwen J. Weighting the Seriousness of Perceived Health Problems Using Thurstone’s Method of Paired Comparisons. Int J Epidemiol. 10:93–7.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by