More articles from Volume 43, Issue 3, 2014
KOLOR DOPPLER U DIJAGNOSTICI PATOLOŠKIH PROMENA KRVNIH SUDOVA VRATA
ZASTUPLJENOST MIKROORGANIZAMA SUBGINGIVALNOG PLAKA KOD RAZLIČITIH STEPENA INFLAMACIJE I DESTRUKCIJE TKIVA PARODONCIJUMA
KLINIČKE MANIFESTACIJE URIČNOG ARTRITISA
Comparative analysis of suicidal poisoning autopsied at the Institute of forensic medicine in Belgrade
The risk factors and their influence in appearance of tuberculosis
INCIDENCE OF RICKET CLINICAL SYMPTOMS AND RELATION BETWEEN CLINICAL AND LABORATORY FINDINGS IN INFANTS
Abstract
Rickets presents osteomalacia which is developed due to negative balance of calcium and / or phosphorus during growth and development. Therefore it appears only in children. The most common reason of insufficient mineralization is deficiency of vitamin D, which is necessary for inclusion of calcium in cartilage and bones. As result, proliferation of cartilage and bone tissue appears, creating calluses on typical places. Bones become soft and curve, resulting in deformities. Our present study included 86 infants, in whom, besides other diseases, clinical and laboratory signs of rickets were identified. In our study, rickets is most common (82.5%) in infants older than 6 months. By clinical picture, craniotabes is present in 46.5% of cases, Harisson groove in 26.7%, rachitic bracelets in 17.4%, rachitic rosary in 17.4% and carpopedal spasms in 2.3% of cases. Leading biochemical signs of vitamin D deficient rickets is hypophosphatemia (in 87.3% of cases), normal calcemia (in 75.6% of cases) and increased values of alkaline phosphatase (in 93% of cases). It has been shown that rickets in infant age may later affect higher incidence of juvenile diabetes, infection of lower respiratory tract, osteoporosis, and so on.
Keywords
References
Citation
Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.