RESULTS OF OTOPLASTY BY SCORING ANTERIOR SURFACE OF AURICULAR CARTILAGE

Jugoslav Gasic ,
Jugoslav Gasic
R. Jovic ,
R. Jovic
M. Filipovic ,
M. Filipovic
S. Lemajic-Komazec ,
S. Lemajic-Komazec
Z. Komazec ,
Z. Komazec
B. Bozic
B. Bozic

Published: 01.12.2013.

Volume 43, Issue 3 (2014)

pp. 91-93;

https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed1403091g

Abstract

A prominent ear, so called a protruding or “lop” ear, is the most common congenital deformity of the external ear. This deformity persists when the mastoid-helix angle (MHA) is higher than 30 degrees. It is relatively common among the population with the incidence of about 5%. The aim of this study is to present surgical procedure and our results using otoplasty with scoring anterior surface of the auricular cartilage. To analyze objective and subjective surgical procedure effects. Between 2011 and 2014 we treated 28 patients. We found statistically high significance p<0.01 in value mastoid-helix angle (MHA) preoperative and postoperative. In patients with bilateral otoplasty the difference between left and right MHAs after surgical procedure is less than 4 degrees. The difference of head-helix distance (HHD) preoperative and postoperative is statistically important with high significance p<0.05. Preoperative satisfaction by personal appearance was better after surgical procedure p<0.05. Complications occurred in 9 cases (32.4%). Otoplasty by scoring anterior surface of auricular cartilage is safe procedure for correction of prominent ear with excellent results on patient satisfaction by personal appearance. Effect of reducing the MHA and HHD is long lasting.

Keywords

References

1.
Sivrioglu N, Irkoren S, Aksoy B, Copcu E. Chong-Chet Anterior Scoring Technique for the Correction of Prominent Ears: Results in 30 Patients. 2012;39–42.
2.
Farkas L. Anthropometry of the normal and defective ear. Clin Plast Surg. 1990;213–8.
3.
Siegert R, Krappen S, Kaesemann L, Weerda H. Computer assisted anthropometry of the auricule. Face. 1998;1–6.
4.
Kalcioglu M, Toplu Y, Ozturan O, Yakinci C. Anthropometric growth study of auricle of healthy preterm and term newborns. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;121–7.
5.
Naumann A. Otoplasty -techniques, characteristics and risks. 2007;1–14.
6.
Johnson P. Otoplasty: Shaping the Anthelix. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 1994;(1):71–7.
7.
Schwentner I, Schmutzhard J, Deibl M, Sprinzl G. Health-related quality of life outcame of adult patients after otoplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;629–35.
8.
Peker F, Celikoz B. Otoplasty: Anterior Scoring and Posterior Rolling Techniques in Adults. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2002;267–73.
9.
Chongchet V. A method of antihelix reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;268.
10.
Bhati A, Ijaz M. 2013;267–70.
11.
Rubinho C, Farace F, Figus A, Masia D. Anterior Scoring of the Upper Helical Cartilage as a Refinement in Aesthetic Otoplasty. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2005;(2):88–93.
12.
Yugueros P, Friedland J. Otoplasty: The experience of 100 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;1045–51.
13.
Medicinski P. Klinika za ORL.
14.
Deformitet postoji kada je mastoidheliksni ugao (MHA) veći od 30 stepeni. Deformacija je relativno česta u populaciji sa incidencom od 5%. Cilj ovog rada je prezentacija hirurške procedure i naših rezulatata korišćenjem otoplastike sa skarifikacijom prednje strane aurikularne hrskavice. Analiza objektivnih i subjektivnih efekata nakon hirurške procedure. U periodu od 2011. do 2014. godine operisano je 28 pacijenata. Našli smo statistički značajnu razliku p<0.01 u preoperativnim i postoperativnim vrednostima mastoid-heliks ugla (MHA).

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by