More articles from Volume 43, Issue 3, 2014
KOLOR DOPPLER U DIJAGNOSTICI PATOLOŠKIH PROMENA KRVNIH SUDOVA VRATA
ZASTUPLJENOST MIKROORGANIZAMA SUBGINGIVALNOG PLAKA KOD RAZLIČITIH STEPENA INFLAMACIJE I DESTRUKCIJE TKIVA PARODONCIJUMA
KLINIČKE MANIFESTACIJE URIČNOG ARTRITISA
Comparative analysis of suicidal poisoning autopsied at the Institute of forensic medicine in Belgrade
The risk factors and their influence in appearance of tuberculosis
RESULTS OF OTOPLASTY BY SCORING ANTERIOR SURFACE OF AURICULAR CARTILAGE
Abstract
A prominent ear, so called a protruding or “lop” ear, is the most common congenital deformity of the external ear. This deformity persists when the mastoid-helix angle (MHA) is higher than 30 degrees. It is relatively common among the population with the incidence of about 5%. The aim of this study is to present surgical procedure and our results using otoplasty with scoring anterior surface of the auricular cartilage. To analyze objective and subjective surgical procedure effects. Between 2011 and 2014 we treated 28 patients. We found statistically high significance p<0.01 in value mastoid-helix angle (MHA) preoperative and postoperative. In patients with bilateral otoplasty the difference between left and right MHAs after surgical procedure is less than 4 degrees. The difference of head-helix distance (HHD) preoperative and postoperative is statistically important with high significance p<0.05. Preoperative satisfaction by personal appearance was better after surgical procedure p<0.05. Complications occurred in 9 cases (32.4%). Otoplasty by scoring anterior surface of auricular cartilage is safe procedure for correction of prominent ear with excellent results on patient satisfaction by personal appearance. Effect of reducing the MHA and HHD is long lasting.
Keywords
References
Citation
Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.