INTESTINES INVAGINATION IN 2-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN

Š. Hajrović ,
Š. Hajrović

Health Center Novi Pazar Serbia

I. Preljević
I. Preljević

Health Center Novi Pazar Serbia

Published: 01.12.2010.

Volume 38, Issue 2 (2010)

pp. 113-116;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed201002375H

Abstract

Intussusception is a specific type of delay in the bowel passage which according to frequency, clearly takes place in children's abdominal surgical pathology. Most commonly occurs in children during the first year of life and from 6 and 9 months where the 3 diagnosed in boys than girls 2. The incidence is 1-4 per 1000 live-born children. The most common form of invagination is ileocecala (80%), ileocolic, and ileo-ileal colo-colic. Intussusception is most often idiopathic (almost 90%) cases, while in a very small percentage described the existence pathoanathomic substrate (points leaders), which areusually enlarged lymph nodes or Meckel divertikulum. Surgical therapy for these other groups is much more radical. For a period of 6 years (2003-2009), which we cover the work, the children’s surgery of the Health Center Novi Pazar was treated with 22 children diagnosed with invagination (intussusception). Of this number, there were 14 (63.63%) boys, 8 girls (36.36%), and the average number of cases was 4.44 per year. Frequently appeared ileo-cecal and ileo-ileal (90.63%), while colocolic and ileocolic appeared much less (9.09%). The most common clinical symptoms were the presence of fresh blood in the stool, painful cramps and, vomiting who did the dominant clinical presentation in the majority. Following: fever, malaise, and even convulsions. The conclusion is: triad of symptoms (pain, vomiting and blood in the stool in the form "of currant jelly") were pathognomonic diagnosis. The method of choice in the diagnosis and conservative therapy is the initial hydrostatic desinvagination controlled ultrasound.

Keywords

References

1.
Baracchini A, Chiaravalloti G, Quinti S, Rosi A, Favili T, Ughi C, et al. Intestinal intussusception in children. Minerva Pediatr. 47:215–9.
2.
West KW, Stephens BS, Vave DW. Intussusception: Current management in infants and children. Surg. 102:704–10.
3.
Buettcher M, Baer G, Bonhoeffer J. Three-year surveillance of intussusception in children in Switzerland. Pediatrics. 120(473).
4.
Guarner J, Leon-Bojorge B, Lopez-Corella E. Intestinal intussusception associated with adenovirus infection in Mexican children. Am J Clin Pathol. 120(845).
5.
Navarro O, Intussusception DA. Part 3: Diagnosis and management of those with an identifiable or predisposing cause and those that reduce spontaneously. Pediatr Radiol. 34(305).
6.
Navarro OM, Daneman A, Chae A. Intussusception: The Use of Delayed, Repeated Reduction Attempts and the Management of Intussusceptions due to Pathologic Lead Points in Pediatric Patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 182:1169–76.
7.
Koumanidou C, Vakaki M, Pitroouiakis G. Sonographic detection of lymph nodes in the intussusception of infants and young children. AJR. 178:444–50.
8.
Davis CF, McCabe AJ, Raine PA. The ins and outs of intussusception: history and management over the past fifty years. J Pediatr Surg. 38(60).
9.
Swischuk LE, Hayden CK, Boulden T. Intussusception: indications for ultrasonography and explanation of the doughnut and pseudokidney signs. Pediatr Radiol. 15:388–92.
10.
Shehata S, El Kholi N, Sultan A, El Sahwi E. Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: barium, air, or saline? Pediatr Surg Int. 16(380).
11.
Khanna G, Applegate K. Ultrasound guided intussusception reduction: are we there yet? Abdom Imaging. 33(38).

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by