PERIACINAR CLEFTINGS IN PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA, PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA AND BENIGN HYPERPLASIA OF PROSTATE

M. Vančentović-Mijović ,
M. Vančentović-Mijović

1 Institute of pathology, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica

D. Vukićević ,
D. Vukićević

1 Institute of pathology, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica

N. Mitić ,
N. Mitić

1 Institute of pathology, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica

B. Ðerković ,
B. Ðerković

1 Institute of pathology, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica

M. Knežević
M. Knežević

Department of pathology and forensic medicine Clinical center of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia

Published: 01.12.2010.

Volume 38, Issue 2 (2010)

pp. 1-7;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed201002350V

Abstract

Diagnosis of different pathohystological diseases of prostate in the most cases based on common benignant and malignant characteristics. The presence of periacinar cleftings (PC) is an additional criterion favouring prostatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of our work was to examine the presence of PC around glands in prostatic adenocarcinoma (PA), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and benign hyperplasia of prostate (BHP) and to determinate specificity and sensitiveness for their presence in PA. We analysed biopsy material of Institute of pathology, Medical faculty Priština and Department of pathology and forensic medicine Clinical center of Kragujevac from begining of 2007. till the end of 2008. According to the presence and extent of PC, analysed on high power field (400x), glands were classified as: group 1 - glands without PC or with PC affecting ≤50% of gland circumference; group 2 - glands with PC affecting >50% gland circumference in <50% examined glands and group 3 - glands with PC affecting >50% gland circumference in ≥50% examined glands. By the analyse of our material we found PC around glands in PA, PIN and BHP: the most glands in PA were group 2 (34 or 48,6%) and group 3 (31 or 44,3%), in PIN group 1 (12 or 60%) and group 2 (8 or 40%), in BHP glands at all 100% cases were group 1. We found sensitiveness 92,9% and specificity 73,3% for glands with PC at prostatic adenocarcinoma, which indicate that periacinar cleftings represent a reliable criterion in diagnosis prostatic adenocarcinoma. 

Keywords

References

1.
Krušlin B, Tomas D, Rogatsch H, Novosel I, Cupic H, Belicza M, et al. Periacinar clefting in the prostatic needle core biopsies: an important diagnostic criterion or a simple artifact? Virchows Archiv. 443, 4:524–7.
2.
Young RH, Srigley A, MB U, TM C, A.L. Tumors of the Prostate Gland, Seminal Vesicles, Male Urethra and Penis.
3.
Varma M, Lee MW, P T. Morphological criteria for the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsy specimens. A study of 250 consecutive cases in a routine pathology practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 126:554–61.
4.
Ulamec M, Tomas D, Ensinger C, Cupic H, Belicza M, Mikuz G, et al. Periacinar retraction clefting in proliferative prostatic atrophy and prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 60:1098–101.
5.
Tomas D, Krušlin B. The potential value of (myo)blastic stromal reaction in the diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma. The Prostate. 64:324–31.
6.
Ro JY, Ayala AG, Ordonez NG, JJr C. Mackay B: Intraluminal crystalloids in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical, electron microscopic, and x-ray microanalytic studies. Cancer. 57:2397–407.
7.
Parker DM. Global cancer statistics in year 2000. Lancet Oncol. 2:533–43.
8.
McNeal JE, Price HM, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Stage A versus stage B adenocarcinoma of the prostate: morphological comparison and biological significance. J Urol. 139:61–5.
9.
Krušlin B, Tomas D, H R. Correlation of periacinar retraction clefting in needle core biopsies and corresponding prostatectomy specimens of patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma. Int J Surg Pathol. 13:67–72.
10.
Krušlin B, Novosel I, Reljic A, Cupic H, Spajic B, Belicza M. Periacinar clefting-like spaces in prostatic needle core biopsies (abstract. Acta clin Croat. 41:175.
11.
Brennick JB, O’Connell JX, Dickersin GR, Pilch BZ, Young RH. Lipofuscin pigmentation (so-called “melanosis”) of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol. 18:446-454,.
12.
Krušlin B, Tomas D, Cviko A, Cupic H, Odak LJ, Belicza M. Periacinar clefting and P63 immunostaining in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostatic carcinoma. Pathology & Oncology Research. 12, 4:205–9.
13.
Krušlin B. Periacinarne pukotine u karcinomu prostate, 4. Hrvatski kongres patologa i sudskih medicinara sa međunarodnim učešćem.
14.
Holmes EJ. Crystalloids of prostatic carcinoma: relationship to Bence-Jones crystals. Cancer. 39:2073–80.
15.
Halpert B, Sheehan EA. Schmalhorst WR et al: Carcinoma of the prostate: a survey of 5000 autopsies. Cancer. 16:735–42.
16.
Gaudin PB, Epstein JI. Adenosis of the prostate. Histologic features in transurethral resection specimens. Am J Surg Pathol. 18:863–70.
17.
Epstein JI. Diagnostic criteria of limited adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy. Hum Pathol. 26:223–9.
18.
Eble JN, Sauter G, J E. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs, WHO Classification of Tumours. IARC. :159–214.
19.
Eble JN, Epstein JI. Stage A carcinoma of the prostate. In: Pathology of the Prostate, Seminal Vesicles, and Male Urethra. p. 61–82.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by