RUPTURE OF RECTOSYGMOID COLON AND TRANSRECTOANALIS PROLAPS OF SMALL INTESTINE - case report

S. Aranđelović
S. Aranđelović

Surgical Clinic, Medical faculty of University Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

Published: 01.01.2009.

Volume 37, Issue 1 (2009)

pp. 121-123;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed200901285A

Abstract

Women in the age of 70 years admitted to the hospital in severe condition, 4 months after transvaginal hysterectomy. Physical examinaton revealed small bowel loops passing through the anus into the auter spaces. Previous surgery was as follows: Hysterctomia totalis vaginalis, conservatio adnexorum bill, colpoperineoplastica cum myorraphiam mm. levatores any, vaginopexia sacrospinalis sec. Nichols pp. prolapsus utery totalis am. n 4. On that occasion the anterior wall of rectosygmoid colon was damageden size 70x50 mm by that time. The lesions was neither noted nor repaired during. Postoperativne course was uneventful. After 4 mounths, during phisical strain patient felt sudden pain in abdomen, need for passing the bowels, noting the passage of the intestines through the annal appertura immediate reoperation was undertaken. Through medial infraumbilical approad small intestine was mannualy repositioned the lesion of the large intestine was managed by primary suttures Vicryl 000. Drainage of peritoneum performed. Postoperative course un univentful. Intestinal function restored. Wound healed correctly, per primam.

Keywords

References

1.
Thomson DJ, Warshaw J. Hysterectomy. In: Te Linde’s Operative Gynecology. p. 771–854.
2.
Bachmann GA. Hysterectomy: A critical review. J Reprod Med. 35:839–69.
3.
Maresh MJA, Metcalfe MA, McPherson K. The VALUE national hysterectomy study: Description of the patients and their surgery. BJOG. 109:302–12.
4.
Kovac. Clinical opinion: Guidelines for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 191(2):635–40.
5.
Kovac. Transvaginal hysterectomy: Rationale and surgical approach. Obstet Gynecol.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by