Issue image

More articles from Volume 46, Issue 1, 2017

Ultraviolet A irradiation and photoaging of the mouse skin

Specificity and sensitivity of preoperative total serum prostate specific antigen in diagnosis most common histopathological change of prostate

Epidemiological characteristic of salmonellosis in Serbian areas of Kosovo and Metohija

The frequency and characteristics of regional metastases and their impact on the survival of patients with T1 and T2 laryngeal cancer

The impact of stress on occupational burnout among miners

Citations

Crossref Logo

2

Crossref Logo

Aleksandra Ilić, Dejan Denović

(2019)

Clinical-morphological characteristics of pathological changes in the prostate

Praxis medica, 48(1)

10.5937/pramed1901001i

Crossref Logo

Milica Mijović, Vladica Nedeljković, Danica Vukićević, Nebojša Mitić, Branislav Đerković, Julijana Rašić, Vesna Premović

(2020)

Diagnostic, prognostic and predictive parameters in prostate cancer

Praxis medica, 49(3)

10.5937/pramed2004043m

Specificity and sensitivity of preoperative total serum prostate specific antigen in diagnosis most common histopathological change of prostate

Milica Mijovic ,
Milica Mijovic
Danica Vukicevic ,
Danica Vukicevic
Branislav Djerkovic ,
Branislav Djerkovic
Sladjana Savic ,
Sladjana Savic
Leonida Vitkovic ,
Leonida Vitkovic
V. Nedeljkovic
V. Nedeljkovic

Published: 01.01.2017.

Volume 46, Issue 1 (2017)

pp. 9-19;

https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed1702007m

Abstract

Determination of preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value is primary procedure in diagnosis of different pathological prostate changes (prostate cancer-PC, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia-PIN and benign prostatic hyperplasia-BPH), followed by digital rectal examination and prostate biopsy as gold standard. Disadvantage of high sensitivity and low specificity of PSA testing in diagnosis of PC is a problem in clinical practice. Aim was to determine the diagnostic performance of PSA in diagnosis of PC, PIN and BPH. The study included 100 patients divided into three groups: 70 with PC, 20 with a PIN and 10 with BPH. Patients with PIN and BPH were control group. Preoperative PSA values were determined by Tandem-R, The patients were divided into subgroups by baseline PSA level as follows: 4-10, 11-20, 21-30, 31-40 and> 40. The definitive histopathological diagnosis was made on routine hematoxylineosin slides. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), sensitivity-SE and specificity-SP of each PSA level were evaluated for PC. Preoperative serum PSA levels in patients with PC (median-35.82 ng/ml, min-6 ng/ml, max-960.40 ng/ml) were significantly higher than with PIN (median-9.15 ng/ml, min-3.16 ng/ml, max-27.61 ng/ml) and BPH (median-8.68 ng/ml, min0.80 ng/ml, max-31.20 ng/ml). The best diagnostic characteristics of the PSA are on limit value 10 ng/ml (AUC=0.781, SE=92.9%; SP=63.3%; p<0,0001). PSA is of great help in diagnosis of advanced and initial form of PC. The chance of PC diagnosis was greater than that for other pathological changes when PSA level was higher than 10 ng/ml.

Keywords

References

1.
Abbou C, Lobel B. Prostate specific antigen in the management of prostate cancer. 1993;12.
2.
Alexander E, Qian J, Wollan P. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia does not appear to raise serum prostate-specific antigen concentration. Urology. 1996;693–8.
3.
Amling C, Blute M, Lerner S, Bergstralh E, Bostwick D, Zincke H. Influence of prostate-specific antigen testing on the spectrum of patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy at a large referral practice. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;(5):401–6.
4.
Anderson J, Strickland D, Corbin D, Byrnes J, Zweiback E. Age-specific reference ranges for serum prostate-specific antigen. Urology. 1995;54–7.
5.
Augustin H, Hammerer P, Graefen M, Palisaar J, Daghofer F, Huland H, et al. Characterisation of biomolecular profiles in primary high-grade prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2003;(11):662–8.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by