THE IMPACT OF OCCUPATIONAL STRESS ON WORK ABILITY OF ELECTRICIANS

Lj. Kulić ,
Lj. Kulić

Faculty of Medicine, University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Mitrovica, Kosovo

J. Jovanović ,
J. Jovanović

Faculty of Medicine, University of Nis, Niš, Serbia

M. Galjak ,
M. Galjak

Faculty of Medicine, University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Mitrovica, Kosovo

V. Krstović Spremo ,
V. Krstović Spremo

Faculty of Medicine in Foča, University of East Sarajevo, Lukavica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

S. Đurić ,
S. Đurić

Faculty of Medicine, University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Mitrovica, Kosovo

M. Mirković ,
M. Mirković

Faculty of Medicine, University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Mitrovica, Kosovo

J. Milošević ,
J. Milošević

Faculty of Medicine, University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Mitrovica, Kosovo

J. Jovanović
J. Jovanović

Faculty of Medicine, University of Nis, Niš, Serbia

Published: 01.01.2019.

Volume 47, Issue 1 (2019)

pp. 25-31;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed201901420K

Abstract

Introduction The testing of stressors and the impact of stress on health and work ability of electricians working in workplaces with a special health risk is very important.


OBJECTIVE is to examine the impact of occupational stress on the ability of electricians to work.


METHODS The research was designed as a cross sectional study and covered 108 respondents, classified into two groups: electricians (52) and control group (56) made up of administrative workers. The survey included the following: Questionnaire on basic sociodemographic indicators of respondents, IRS Questionnaire, Work Ability Index (WAI) Questionnaire, General Health Questionnsire (GHQ), Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) and Occupational Stress Assessment Questionnaire. Data analysis was performed with SPSS.


RESULTS The frequency of different categories of WAI score is uniform between the tested groups (p = 0.155). Work ability is poor in 11.5%, moderate in 25%, good in 26.90% and excellent in 36.5% of electricians. The frequency of different categories of WAI score is aligned between the tested groups (p = 0.155). By analyzing all components of IRS score, it was found that there is a statistically significant difference in the components between the electricians and the  control group: requirements (p <0.001) and work role (p <0.001); GHQ is higher in electricians, but no statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.082); CBI is statistically significantly higher in electricians (p <0.001) and WAI score is statistically significantly higher in electricians (p = 0.039). In the overall population, the 10 strongest stressors were ranked and statistically significant difference in all stressors (p <0.001) between the electrician and the control group was shown. The values of the stressors are equal in relation to WAI score categories. In the electricians, the strongest stressors are: night work (4.60), hazards (4.58), shift work (4.54), working overtime (4.46), time limit for individual tasks (4.44), fear of injuries (4.42), pressure of time limits for execution of tasks (4.23), work overload (4.22), inadequate work space (4.18) and daily unforeseen situations (4.10). Average value of all stressors among electricians is 2.87 ± 1.10 (Min 1.10, Max 4.60). In the tested population, 14 different stressors have higher values than the average value of all stressors. In the control group, the average value of all stressors is 1.84 ± 0.33 (Min. 1.17, Max 2.69). Correlation analysis has shown that there is a correlation of age with shift work (r = 0.130, p = 0.013) and working overtime (r = -0.220, p <0.001). URS is statistically significantly related to the time limit for individual tasks (r = 0.149, p = 0.005) and pressure of time limits for execution of tasks (r = 0.125, p = 0.017). ERS is statistically significantly related to night work (r = 0.169, p = 0.001), shift work (r = 0.160, p = 0.002), time limit for execution of tasks (r = 0.203, p <0.001) pressure of time limits for execution of tasks (r = 0.194, p <0.001), work overload (r = 0.128, p = 0.017) and inadequate work space (r = 0.122, p = 0.022). The subjective assessment of work ability in relation to physical (p = 0.010) and psychological requirements (p <0.001) is statistically significantly lower in electricians compared to control group. DISCUSSION By analyzing all components of IRS score, it is found that there is a statistically significant difference between the electricians and the control group in the requirements and the working role components. In the overall population, the top 10 stressors were ranked and it was shown that there was a statistically significant difference in all stressors between the electricians and the control group. The average value of all stressors in the electricians is high and a large number (14) of different stressors have higher values than the average value of all the stressors. The subjective assessment of work ability in relation to physical and mental requirements is statistically significantly worse in electricians than in control group. More than half of electricians went on sick leave (mostly short leaves) during the previous year.

CONCLUSION Occupational stress significantly affects work ability of electricians. Values of WAI score are statistically significantly higher in electricians, and values of stressors are equal in relation to WAI score categories. Correlation analysis has shown there is a correlation between age, URS and ERS with individual stressors. 

Keywords

References

1.
Dmitrović I, Grubić-Nešić L. Stress and stressors in the working environment. Vol. 9, Zbornik radova Fakulteta tehničkih nauka, Novi Sad.
2.
Milczarek M, Schneider E, Gonzalez ER. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, European risk observatory report, OSH in figures: Stress at work - facts and figures. In: ISSN 1830-5946.
3.
McTernan WP. Enhanced co-worker social support in isolated work groups and its mitigating role on the work-family conflict-depression loss spiral. Vol. 13, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
4.
Holman D. Job types and job quality in Europe. Vol. 66, Human Relations. p. 475–502.
5.
Kishore K, Khan NA. A report on GIT disorders and related complications in coal miners of Shaktinagar, Sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh. Vol. 2, Archives of Applied Science Research. p. 231–7.
6.
Veličković D, Mladenović P, Jovanović J. Profesionalni stresori u javnim preduzećima. Vol. 1, Studentski Medicinski Glasnik. p. 1–5.
7.
McTernan WP. Beneath the surface: An exploration of remoteness and work stress in the mines. In: Psychosocial Factors at Work in the Asia Pacific. p. 341–58.
8.
Cottini E, Lucifora C. Mental health and working conditions in Europe. Vol. 66, ILR Review. p. 958–88.
9.
Edwards A. Workplace stress in South African mineworkers. In: INRS Occupational Health Research Conference: Health risks associated with mixed exposures.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by