COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTHROPOMETRIC AND SPIROMETRIC PARAMETERS IN ATHLETES

J. Popadić Gaćeša ,
J. Popadić Gaćeša

Institute of physiolgy, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

O. Barak ,
O. Barak

Institute of physiolgy, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

M. Drapšin ,
M. Drapšin

Institute of physiolgy, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

A. Klašnja ,
A. Klašnja

Institute of physiolgy, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

B. Srdić ,
B. Srdić

Institute of anatomy, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

D. Karaba Jakovljević
D. Karaba Jakovljević

Institute of physiolgy, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Published: 01.12.2008.

Volume 36, Issue 2 (2008)

pp. 57-61;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed200802249P

Abstract

Aim of this study was to determine characteristics and correlation between basic anthropometric and spirometric parameters in athletes of different sports and non sportsmen. Measurements were conducted on 140 male and female athletes: volleyball, basketball, soccer, handball players, runners, VESLACI and 60 non sportsmen, 30 female and 30 male. All measurements were conducted in the Laboratory for functional diagnostics at the Department of Physiology, Medical School, Novi Sad. BMI values were normal for all athletes except in handball players, whose average BMI was 25.70+/-2.35 2 kg/m . Average values of body fat percent (BF %) were significantly higher in female athletes, the lowest values were measured in female runners (determined by both methods anthropometry, bioimpedance), while in the group of male athletes the highest body fat was found in basketball players. Statisticaly significant gender difference was found for all anthropometric parameters. Athletes have significantly lower values of BMI and BF% compared to non sportsmen, and males compared to females. Those gender differences are the result of sex determined diferences in body fat distribution, and different length of sports activities. BMI is not a good predictor of body fat content in athletes, because it's high values indicates masculinity rather than fatness. Spirometric parameters show significantly higher values in athletes of both sexes, because ventilatory function is expected as an effect of chronic adaptation on training. Correlation differences between anthropometric and spirometric parameters can be explained by the age differences in our participants and the length of their sports activities.

Keywords

References

1.
Goodpaster BH. Measuring body fat distribution and content in humans. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care. 5(5):481–7.
2.
Bottaro MF, Heyward VH, Bezerra RFA, Wagner DR. Skinfold method vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to assess body composition in normal and obese women. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online. 5(2):11–8.
3.
Srdić B, Stočić E, Polzović A. Odnos parametara koji definišu veličinu i raspored masnog tkiva. Medicinski Pregled. 56(5):232–6.
4.
Heyward VH, Stolarczyk LM. Applied Body Composition Assessment. Human Kinetics. :21–43.
5.
Matiega J. The testing of physical efficiency. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 4:223–30.
6.
Yao M, Roberts SB, Ma G, Pan H, McCrory MA. Field methods for body composition assessment are valid in healthy Chinese adults. Journal of Nutrition. 132:310–7.
7.
Erselcan T, Candad F, Saruhan S, Ayca T. Comparison of body composition analysis methods in clinical routine. Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism. 44:243–8.
8.
Snijder MB, Kuyf BEM, Deurenberg P. Effect of body build on the validity of predicted body fat from body mass index and bioelectrical impedance. Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism. 43:277–85.
9.
Prentice AM, Jebb SA. Beyond body mass index. Obesity Reviews. 2(3):141–7.
10.
Deurenberg P, Andreoli A, Borg P, Kukkonen-Harjula K, Lorenzo A, Marken Lichtenbelt WD, et al. The validity of predicted body fat percentage from body mass index and from impedance in samples of five European populations. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 55:973–9.
11.
Baumgartner RN, Chumlea WC, Roche AF. Estimation of body composition from bioelectrical impedance of body segments. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 50:221–6.
12.
Fuller NJ, Elia M. Potential use of bioelectrical impedance of the whole body and of body segments for the assessment of body composition: Comparison with densitometry and anthropometry. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 43:779–91.
13.
Loy SF, Likes EA, Andrews PM. Easy grip on body composition measurements. ACSM’s Health & Fitness Journal. 2(4):16–9.
14.
Ravaglia G, Forti P, Maioli F, Boschi F, Cicognani A, Gasbarrini G. Measurement of body fat in healthy elderly men: A comparison of methods. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences. 54A(2:70–6.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by