THE IMPORTANCE OF EARLY WARNING SCORE IN PREDICTING IN-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST

S. Trpković ,
S. Trpković

Surgical Clinic, Medical faculty of University Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

A. Pavlović ,
A. Pavlović

Surgical Clinic, Medical faculty of University Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

A. Jovanović ,
A. Jovanović

Surgical Clinic, Medical faculty of University Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

N. Videnović ,
N. Videnović

Surgical Clinic, Medical faculty of University Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

P. Jovanović ,
P. Jovanović

Surgical Clinic, Medical faculty of University Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

P. Bojanović
P. Bojanović

Surgical Clinic, Medical faculty of University Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

Published: 01.12.2008.

Volume 36, Issue 2 (2008)

pp. 25-31;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed200802244T

Abstract

The Early Warning Score is a simple physiological scoring system that can be calculated at the patient's bedside, using parameters which are mesured in the majority of unwell patients. Patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest often have abnormal clinical observations documented prior to the arrest. Study objestives:This study assesses wheather these patients have less favourable outcome following in-hospital cardiac arrest. Matherials and the methods:For the present study, the patients' hospital charts were reviewed to identify possible abnormal observations within 8 h prior to the arrest. Results: From the total of 100 patients who sufferd in-hospital cardiac arrest, 64 patients had documentation of vital signs and 9 patients had no documentation of vital signs. Of the patients with documented vital signs 27 (29,7%) had normal vital signs and 64 (70,3%) had abnormal observations. Among these 64 patients the distribution was as follows: 17 patients (13,1%) had respiatory rate below 8 or over 20 per min, 40 (30,8%) had puls rate below 40 or over 140 beats per min, 20 patients (15,4%) had systolic arterial blood pressure below 90 or over 200 mmHg, 5 (3,7%) had temperature (˚C) below 36,1 or over 37,9 ˚C, 20 (15,4%) had oxygen saturation below 90%, 14 (10,8%) had decrease in consciousness and 14 (10,8%) had urine output below 50 ml/2hours). Compared with patients whose EWS were 0-2 (ОR 1,2; 95% CI: 0,935-1,507) patients with EWS 3 or more were 6,5 times more likely to die in first 24 hours (OR: 7,8; 95% CI: 1,205-50,205). Conclusions:Patients with documented clinically abnormal observations prior to in-hospital cardiac arrest have a worse outcome than those without. The main implication of these is that these patients need to be identified in time thereby possibly avoiding arrest. This can also be used when assessing the prognosis of in-hospital patients after achieved ROSC.

Keywords

References

1.
Lee A, Lum E, O’Regan WJ, Hillman KM. Early postoperative emergencies requiring an intensive care team intervention. The role of ASA physical status and after-hours surgery. Anaesthesia. 53:529–35.
2.
Skrifvars MB, Saarinen K, Ikola K, Kuisma M. Improved survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest outside critical care areas. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 49:1534–9.
3.
Harrison GA, Jacques TC, Killborn G, McLaws ML. The prevalence of recordings of the signs of critical conditions and emergency responses in hospital wards—the SOCCER study. Resuscitation. 65:149–57.
4.
Nurmi J, Harjola VP, Nolan J, Castren M. Observations and warning signs prior to cardiac arrest. Should emergency medical teams intervene earlier? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 49:702–6.
5.
Buist M, Bernard S, Nguyen TV. Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective study. Resuscitation. 62:137–41.
6.
Goldhill DR, McNarry AF. Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients. Br J Anaesth. 92:882–4.
7.
Hodgetts TJ, Kenward G, Vlackonikolis I. Incidence, location, and reasons for avoidable in-hospital cardiac arrest in a district general hospital. Resuscitation. 54:115–23.
8.
Herlitz J, Bang A, Aune S. Characteristics and outcome among patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest in monitored and non-monitored areas. Resuscitation. 48:125–35.
9.
Franklin C, Mathew J. Developing strategies to prevent in-hospital cardiac arrest: analysing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event. Crit Care Med. 22(2):144–7.
10.
Buist MD, Jarmolowski E, Burton PR. Recognising clinical instability in hospital patients before cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to intensive care. A pilot study in a tertiary-care hospital. Med J Aust. 171:22–5.
11.
Dumot JA, Burval DJ, Sprung J. Outcome of adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a tertiary referral center including results of „limited“ resuscitation. Arch Intern Med. 161:1751–8.
12.
Goldhill DR, McNarry AF, Hadjianastassiou VG, Tekkis PP. The longer patients are in hospital before Intensive Care admission, the higher their mortality. Intensive Care Med. 30:1908–13.
13.
Skrifvars M, Nurmi J, Ikola K. Reduced survival following resuscitation in patients with documented clinically abnormal observations prior to in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 70:215–22.
14.
Goldhill DR, McNarry AF. Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients. Br J Anaesth. 92:882–4.
15.
Rees JE. Early Warning Scores. World Anaesthesia. 17:1–5.
16.
Pavlović A. Kardiopulmonalno cerebralna reanimacija. Drugo dopunjeno izdanje.
17.
Pavlović A. Kardiopulmonalno cerebralna reanimacija. Beoprint-Petrović.
18.
Smith AF, Wood J. Can some in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrests be prevented? A prospective survey. Resuscitation. 37:133–7.
19.
Hodgetts TJ, Kenward G, Vlackonikolis I. Incidence, location, and reasons for avoidable in-hospital cardiac arrest in a district general hospital. Resuscitation. 54:115–23.
20.
Peberdy MA, Chen WJ, Ma MH. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 58:297–308.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by