In period of ten years from o1.01.1990- till the 30.06.1999 on the University clinic of Gynecology and Obstetric in Pristina there were 2474 repeted cesarean section. With two S.C. were 2041, with three S.C. were 343, with the four S.C. 74 and with the five S.C. were 16 women. Intraoperation risck in repeated S.C. was defined with preasants of the erly intraoperation complicatios such as (hysterectomia caesarea, lesio vesicae urinariae and laesio intestini). We separate the early intraoperations in the women with the second and third S.C., and early intraoperation complications in the women with the fourth and fifth S.C. Results of the study showes that there were no statistical important differences.
R. A, N. M, T G. Chakraborty S.: Postoperative complications after cesarean section: a comparative study of elective and emergency cesarean sections. Indian J Surg. 63(6):453–9.
2.
M. P, S. JT, S. K, D. S, V M. Morbiditet nakon carskog reza u gojaznih. In: Jubilarna Ginekološko-akušerska nedelja SLD Zbornik radova. p. 25.
3.
S. S, P. K, M. M, I. B, S G. O Simić: Mogućnosti histeroskopije u prosuđivanju ožiljka na uterusu nakon carskog reza. Zbornik radova IX Kongres Ginekologa i Opstetričara Jugoslavije. :187.
4.
R. R, C. M, M.A. F, L. M, H B. Uterine ruptures. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 89(2):77–80.
5.
B. R, P. M, M. D, J. M, M. I, M. B, et al. Plesinac S.: Naša iskustva sa vaginalnim porođajem nakon carskog reza. In: Jubilarna Ginekološko Akušerska nedelja SLD Zbornik radova. p. 148.
6.
K.D. G, O.A. H, A.J. G, C.J. H, L.D P. Repeat cesareans: how many are elective? Dept. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center. p. 574–8.
7.
Salamon B. Jednoslojno ekstra endrometijalno šivenje stijenke uterusa kod carskog reza. Sarajevo Medicinski fakultet.
8.
Cindroj J. Poticaj za poboljšanje tehnike carskog reza. Jugoslav ginekol opstet. XIV:65–7.
9.
sar SD. Zatvaranje uterusa u toku carskog reza produžnim ketgut savom. In: Zbornik radova XXXVIII Ginekološko-akušerska Nedelja SLD. p. 255–9.
10.
V.B. Š, D. L, N. A, Z R. Pilić J.: Carski rez i postoperativni morbilitet porodilje. :55.
11.
I. T, K. H, H. T, O T. Takeshi T.: Postoperative complication of cesarean section, risk factors and preventions. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 33:349–54.
12.
T.O. S, R Y. Johnson W.: Effect of maternal age on risk of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 81:702–5.
13.
W.C P. Caesarean hysterectomy: indications, technique, and complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 29:318.
14.
J.L. H, J.R L. Gibbs C.P.: Cesarean delivery: common complications and their management. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 48(3):607–23.
15.
S. M, S. H, D A. Postoperative complications following cesarean delivery: the role of uterine incision type. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 187(1):111–6.
16.
A. R, I. W, J B. Early diagnosis and management of uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 91(6):973–7.
17.
J.R. B, M. O ’Rourke, V B. The impact of the number of previous cesarean deliveries on the risk of uterine rupture: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 108(6):1377–85.
18.
J.M. O ’Leary, R.E K. Roth M.A.: Comparative analysis of cesarean section delivery techniques and their association with postpartum infection rates. Am J Surg. 178(5):421–5.
19.
E.M. R, M. J, T K. Oja H.: Intraoperative and postoperative complications of cesarean section: a review of 1,000 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 67(8):689–92.
20.
H. S, D. L, G. S, S A. Impact of cesarean delivery on long-term reproductive health. Obstet Gynecol. 97(3):340–5.
21.
A. P, L.C. G, O L. Cesarean delivery at term and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 181(1):159–66.
22.
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice ACOG Committee Opinion No 404: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Obstet Gynecol. 111(1):181–3.
23.
T.O. S, W.G J. Yeo R.: Effects of maternal age on delivery outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 85(3):374–8.
24.
L. G, C D. Long-term effects of cesarean delivery on future pregnancies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 37(4):632–9.
25.
D.A. M, T.M. G, R.B G. Paul R.H.: Intrapartum rupture of the unscarred uterus. Obstet Gynecol. 89:671–3.
26.
S. V, M. F, P. R, M. V, B N. Porođaj posle carskog reza Zbornik radova. In: Jubilarna Ginekološko-akušerska Nedelja SLD. p. 144.
27.
W. G, R.T K. Elective versus emergency cesarean hysterectomy, cases in resistance program setting: a review of 129 cases from 1984-88. Am J Obs Gyn. 165:91,.
28.
B.C O. Meaory S.C.: Emergency obstetric hysterectomy in Eastern Nigeria. Int-Suka. 75:109,.
29.
Lj. R, B. P, G. R, Z M. Cvetković S.: Dehiscencija šava na uterusu kao najčešća komplikacija kod carskog reza izazvana infekcijom. In: Jubilarna Gin-Akušerska nedelja SLD Zbornik radova. p. 164.
30.
D.S. S, I. P, A. N, S. D, D.K. S, R. G, et al. Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel. Eur J Obs-Gyn Reprod Biol. 57(1):7–12.
31.
M. R, A F. Smyk L.V.: Spontaneous rupture of a low transverse cesarean scar. Dep. of Family Medicine, Florida Hospital, Orlando. South Med J. 87(10):1001–2.
32.
P. A, C.C M. Fotea G.: Hypotonia uterine post operations cesariens. Rev Franc Gynec. 80(7):515–8.
33.
B.L. F, J.R. G, Y L. Wolde Tsadik G.: Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multi-center study. Obstet Gynecol. 83(6):927–32.
34.
D. M, R. J, V. P, V. R, B S. Histerektomija u toku carskog reza. IX kongres ginekologa i opsteričara Jugoslavije. :301.
35.
S. S, O. G, E. Z, M S. Sassoon E.: Evaluation of breast stimulation for induction of labor in women with a prior cesarean section and in grandmultiparas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 74:40–1.
36.
H.M. F, S.F A. Stevens B.: Risk factors in extreme grand multiparity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 41:17–22.
37.
J. S. Cesarean Hysterectomy, Southern Med. J. 82:1245,.
38.
B. K, L. H, A. N, D. R, G.A G. Chayen B.: Great grand multiparity beyond the 10th delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 50:17–9.
39.
K. F, B.A. P, R. M, E P. Timor-Tritsh I.: The “Grand multipara” - is it a problem? A review of 5785 cases.
40.
A. B, T. K, O. T, V. G, R.H. L, R.L B. Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 181:669–74.
41.
W.C. P, Almen W. Muller R.: Catastrophic uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 64:792–7.
42.
M.N. F, L. M, E.G B. Hiar J.: Grand multiparity: is it a high-risk pregnancy? Rev Paul Med. 109:14–8.
43.
A. N, H. Z, C.E. S, P. H, E.A J. Nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Results from repeat cesarean sections. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 113:451–3.
44.
P. B, R. BA, K H. Vaginal delivery after two previous cesarean sections. Zentralbl Gynakol. 121:449–53.
45.
G.C. G, C.M. B, H.A B. Bruinse H.W.: Elective cesarean section is preferred after completion of a minimum of 38 weeks of pregnancy. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 142:2300–3.
46.
G.J. H, M.E H. Planned cesarean section for term breech delivery.
47.
J. N, M. S, E. M, M. J, V. J, M A. Rupture of the uterus during pregnancy. 5th World Congress of Perinatal Medicine. J Perinat Med. 29:522.
48.
R. R, G. S, S. M, M W. The life cycle of the myofibroblast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 145:389–94.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
