EHOCARDIOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF LEFT VENTRICLE IN NON-Q ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

S. Sovtić ,
S. Sovtić

Internal Clinic, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

S. Tomić ,
S. Tomić

Internal Clinic, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

V. Trajković ,
V. Trajković

Internal Clinic, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

A. Jovanović ,
A. Jovanović

Internal Clinic, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

Z. Marčetić ,
Z. Marčetić

Internal Clinic, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

V. Perić ,
V. Perić

Internal Clinic, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

R. Stolić ,
R. Stolić

Internal Clinic, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

T. Novaković ,
T. Novaković

Internal Clinic, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

S. Lazić ,
S. Lazić

Internal Clinic, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

S. Pajović
S. Pajović

Internal Clinic, Medical faculty Priština , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

Published: 01.12.2006.

Volume 34, Issue 2 (2006)

pp. 1-5;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed200602145S

Abstract

In this work we have examined echocardiographic characteristics of left ventricle in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We used prospective study, during 12 months, and we followed 55 patients with diagnosed non Q AMI. All patients were hospitalized in the Coronary unit. Results: 55 consecutive (40 males middle age 55,4±8,7 and 15 females middle age 57,4±10,3) had non Q AMI. Value of ejection fraction: after 4.day - 50,4±6,2% ,2.weeks - 54,6±5,8%, 4. weeks - 59,3±5,4%. Value of ejection fraction in patients with thrombolytic therapy: 61,6±6,8% vs. 57,3±6,6% p> 0,05;Value of left ventricle fractional shortening: 28,8±2,5% (in patients with thrombolytic therapy 30,3±4,8% vs.27,2±5,9%) Value of end2 2 2 - diastolic volume: after 4.day- 62,5±5,3 ml/m , 2.weeks - 63,1±5,4 ml/m , 4. weeks - 64,4±5,8 ml/m (in patients with throm 2 2 2 bolytic therapy 60,5±9,2 ml/m vs. 67,4±8,4 ml/m ) Value of endsistolic volume: after 4. day - 26,2±2,1 ml/m , 2.weeks2 2 26,8±2,3 ml/m , 4. weeks - 27,6±2,2 ml/m (in patients with thrombolytic therapy 25,6±2,8 ml/m2 vs. 31,7±3,1 ml/m2 p> 0,05). During the in-hospital follow up period, 2(3,6%) patients and during the post-hospital follow up period, 1 (1,9%) patients with non Q AMI had lethal outcome.

Keywords

References

1.
Levine HD. Subendocardial Infarction: Report of Six Cases and Critical Survey of the Literature. Circulation. 1:246–52.
2.
Gibson RS. Non-Q Wave Myocardial Infarction: Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Management. Curr Probl Cardiol. 13:9–72.
3.
Marmor A. Factors Presaging Early Recurrent Myocardial Infarction (Extension. Am J Cardiol. 48:603–10.
4.
Ewy GA. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 16:1505–28.
5.
Ehokardiografija SN. Viktor i Danijela. :115–48.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by