QUALITY QUALITY AND EFFICACY AND EFFICACY OF A TELECOLPOSCOPY TELECOLPOSCOPY PROGRAMME PROGRAMME

Ž. Perišić ,
Ž. Perišić

OB/GYN Clinic "Narodni front", Medical faculty Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

D. Vukićević ,
D. Vukićević

Institute of Pathology, Medical faculty Pristina , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

N. Perišić ,
N. Perišić

OB/GYN Clinic "Narodni front", Medical faculty Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

A. Egić ,
A. Egić

OB/GYN Clinic "Narodni front", Medical faculty Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

L. Tasić
L. Tasić

OB/GYN Clinic "Narodni front", Medical faculty Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Published: 01.12.2006.

Volume 34, Issue 2 (2006)

pp. 13-15;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed200602147P

Abstract

We tested the performance of telecolposcopy in the diagnosis of various squamous intraepithelial lesions. There were three groups of physicians: Group 1 consisted of 15 gynaecologists who were not trained in colposcopy; Group 2 consisted of six experienced colposcopists (specialists); Group 3 was a supervising team constisting of three experts (colposcopists with more than 15 years of colposcopy experience). The first group took colpophotographs during gynaecological examinations and used a Web browser to compare them with examples from a database of colposcopy findings. Group 2 made their own diagnoses independently. Then the supervising team examined the findings from all 250 patients and made diagnoses that could be considered the ''gold standard''. The findings were identical for Groups 1 and 2 in 219 cases, i.e. an inter- observer agreement of 88%; Cohen's kappa was 0.81. The findings were identical for Groups 1 and 3 in 208 cases, i.e. an inter- observer agreement of 83%; Cohen's kappa was 0.74. The findings were identical for Groups 2 and 3 in 239 cases, i.e. an inter- observer agreement of 96%; Cohen's kappa was 0.93. There was high inter- observer agreement between all participants. However, there were also significant differences in some cases. In the cases of suspected invasive carcinoma, 2 the results showed a significant difference (x =4.8, p < 0,005) because gynaecologists from Group 1 were not sure of their diagnosis and they wanted to obtain a second opinion by referring the decision to a higher level.

Keywords

References

1.
Ferris DG, Macfee MS, Miller JA, Litaker MS, Crawley D, Watson D. The efficacy of telecolposcopy compared with traditional colposcopy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 99(2):248–54.
2.
Ferris DG, Litaker MS, Macfee MS. Remote diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: 2 types of telecolposcopy compared with cervicography. Journal of Family Practice. 52:298–304.
3.
Perisic Z, Rasic R. A multimedia library of colposcopy findings for telecolposcopy. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 9(4):243–4.
4.
Etherington IJ, Dunn J, Shafi MI, Smith T, Luesley DM. Video colpography: a new technique for secondary cervical screening. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 104(2):150–3.
5.
Harper DM, Moncur MM, William H. The technical performance and clinical feasibility of telecolposcopy. Journal of Family Practice.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by