Vrednovanje koštanih markera u kliničkoj praksi

Lj. Smilić ,
Lj. Smilić
M. Muratović ,
M. Muratović
J. Mitić ,
J. Mitić
T. Smilić ,
T. Smilić
B. Biševac
B. Biševac

Published: 15.01.2014.

Volume 42, Issue 3 (2013)

pp. 61-65;

Abstract

Koštani markeri su veoma korisno dijagnostiško sredstvo, mada je njihova klinička upotreba ograničena specifičnim tehničkim i analitičkim aspektima, kao i njihovom pre-analitičkom varijabilnošću. Koštani markeri, za razliku od mineralne gustine kosti, ukazuju na posebne aspekte kvaliteta kostiju, te stoga nude zasebnu i prognostičku perspektivu u ispitivanju promena mineralne gustine kosti I smanjivanju rizika od fraktura. Smanjenje nivoa koštanih markera usko je povezano sa smanjenjem rizika od frakture vratnih pršljenova usled korišćenja raloksifena, rizedronata i alendronata. Postoje brojne mogućnosti za korišćenje ovih markera u kratkoročnom praćenju toka lečenja osteoporoze, pored merenja mineralne koštane gustine, kako bi se otkrili pacijenti koji ne reaguju na terapiju.

Keywords

References

1.
Bauer DC, Black DM, Garnero P, Hochberg M, Ott S, Orloff J, et al. Change in bone turnover and hip, non-spine, and vertebral fracture in alendronate-treated women: The fracture intervention trial. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2004;19(8):1250–8.
2.
Bjarnason NH, Bjarnason K, Hassager C, Christiansen C. The response in spinal bone mass to tibolone treatment is related to bone turnover in elderly women. Bone. 1997;20(2):151–5.
3.
Rio FMC, Frutos AJF, Gonzalez GJI, Bellido CJ, Marcos ML, Fernandez RA. Monitoring individual response to hormone replacement therapy with bone markers. Bone. 2000;26(6):553–60.
4.
Delcker A, Diener HC, Wilhelm H. Changes in bone mineral density explain little of the reduction in vertebral or nonvertebral fracture risk with anti-resorptive therapy. Bone. 2004;34(4):599–604.
5.
Durham LH, Willatt DJ, Yung MW, Jones I, Stevenson PA, Ramadan MF. Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2003;18(6):1051–6.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by