Using cone beam computed thomography in planning the extraction of impacted third molars

Zoran Vlahovic ,
Zoran Vlahovic
Aleksandar Djordjevic ,
Aleksandar Djordjevic
Filip Djordjevic ,
Filip Djordjevic
Jelena Stanisic
Jelena Stanisic

Published: 01.06.2016.

Volume 45, Issue 2 (2016)

pp. 39-43;

https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed1602039v

Abstract

The panoramic radiography is the most used diagnostic imaging method in planning impacted lower third molar extractions. However, often panoramic radiography does not provide enough information in treatment planning for performing safely surgical extraction of impacted third molars. CBCT (Cone beam computed tomography) provides more precise information in diagnostic analysis especially for planning surgical procedures where complications can be expected due to close relationship between mandibular canal and lower impacted third molars. The aim of this study is comparative analysis of panoramic radiography and CBCT in evaluating the topographic relationship between mandibular canal and impacted third molars. The study included 50 patients with close relationship between mandibular canal and impacted third molars detected using panoramic radiography. After panoramic radiography analysis CBCT was performed in order to diagnose, plan and prevent complications during the surgical tooth extraction. CBCT examination considered comparative analysis with panoramic radiography, marking, volume rendering and assessment of mandibular canal in buccolingual direction. Out of total patients where suprimposition of mandibular canal and impacted third molar on panoramic radiography was detected, in 32 patients mandibular chanal was localised on lingual side. Mandibular canal was positioned at bucal side in 18 of 50 patients. Results of this research indicate that panoramic radiography can be useful in everyday practice for diagnosis, planning and preparing lower third molar extractions, but in cases where close relationship between mandibular canal and lower third molars is detected CBCT is recommended as more precise radiographic imaging method in order to prevent complications.

Keywords

References

1.
Kipp D, Goldstein B, Weiss W. Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1,377 surgical procedures. JADA. 1980;185–92.
2.
Mihailović B. Impaktirani zubi-Etiologija ,učestalost, klinička slika i terapija-Doktorska disertacija; Medicinski fakultet Univerzitet u Prištini. 2006;
3.
Rud J. Third molar surgery: relationship of root to mandibular canal and injuries to inferior alveolar dental nerve. Tandlaegebladet. 1983;619–31.
4.
Robinson P, Loescher A, Yates J, Smith K. Current management of damage to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves as a result of removal of third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;285–92.
5.
Cheung L, Leung Y, Chow L, Wong M, Chan E, Fok Y. Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;320–6.
6.
Kim HG, Lee JH. Analysis and evaluation of relative positions of mandibular third molar and mandibular canal impacts. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;278–84.
7.
Loescher A, Smith K, Robinson P. Nerve Damage and Third Molar Removal. Dental Update.
8.
Rood J, B. Nooraldeen Shehab; The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Briish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1990;20–5.
9.
Koong, Pharoah M, Bulsara M, Tennant. Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibularcanal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons.
10.
Maglione M, Costantinides F, Bazzocchi G. Classification of impacted mandibular third molars on cone-beam CT images. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;(2):224–31.
11.
Monaco G, Mpntevechhi M. Realibility of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relaionship between the mandibular chanal and impacted third molars. JADA. :312–8.
12.
Sinha P, Pai A. Assessment of proximity of impacted mandibular third molar roots to the mandibular canal using intra oral periapical radiography and cone-beam computerized tomography: A comparative study. International Dental & Medical Journal of Advanced Research. 2015;1–5.
13.
Assessment of the Relationship between the Mandibular Canal and Impacted Third Molars Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Mansoura Journal of Dentistry. 2014;(3):49–55.
14.
Todorović L, Petrovič L, Jurišić M. Oralna hirurgija. Nauka Beograd. 2007;123–31.
15.
Luiz Delamare E, Salatino Liedke G, Vizzott M, Heraldo, Dias Da Silveira L. Topographic relationship of impacted third molars and mandibular canal: correlation of panoramic radiograph signs and CBCT images Braz. J Oral Sci. (3).
16.
Jung YH, Nah KS, Cho BH. Correlation of panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of a superimposed relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2012;121–7.
17.
Pell G, Gregory G. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified technique for removal. Dent Dig. 1933;330–8.
18.
Jb Ludlow J, Koovisto. Dosimetry of Orthodontic Diagnostic FOVs Using Low Dose CBCT Protocol. www. PhD posters.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by