Impact of low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields and interference currents in the formation of heterotopic ossification after total hip instalation in the hip joint

S. Ivkovic ,
S. Ivkovic
S. Minic ,
S. Minic
I. Stankovic
I. Stankovic

Published: 01.06.2015.

Volume 44, Issue 2 (2015)

pp. 31-34;

https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed1502031i

Abstract

Due to the extension of life expectancy, the number of elderly people increases, and thus the number of disease and injuries of the locomotor system, especially the hip joint. One of the persistent trend is an increasing trend in the number of patients with coxarthrosis and implanted total hip endoprosthesis. One of the postoperative complications that occurred after implantation a total hip endoprosthesis is heterotopic ossification (HO). HO is the most common complication that occurs after the implantation a total hip endoprosthesis with recorded cases in the range of 9-90%. HO are insufficiently understood phenomenon, which is characterized by the formation of bone in periarticular tissues. We prospectively followed patients who implanted total hip endoprostheses in the department of orthopedics ZC in Kos. Mitrovica in 2008. and 2009. year. We examined the influence of physical agents on the prevention of HO near the hip joint. In these patients the treatment was carried out kinesiotherapeutic at the Center for Rehabilitation Health Center Kosovska Mitrovica, as well as pulse therapy low frequency magnetic field frequency of 30 Hz, 30 minutes, 8 mT intensity and 15 minutes interferential current, 0-100 Hz frequency. All patients were on the rehabilitation of one month (20 days). Based on this research we confirmed the assumption that the use of low frequency pulsed magnetic fields, interference currents and kinesitherapy prevents HO in patients after implantation of total endoprosthesis of the hip joint.

Keywords

References

1.
Kocić M. 1996;
2.
Puzas J, Miller M, Rosier R N. Pathologic bone formation. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research. 1989;269–81.
3.
Boitzy A, Zimmerman H. Komplikationen bei totalprotesen der hufte. Acta Orthop, Unfall-Chir. 1969;
4.
Sarmiento A, Grimes HA. Moore vittaliumprosthesis in the treatment of acute fractures and other diseases of the hip. Clin Orthop. 1963;(2):31–4.
5.
Brooker F, Bowerman J, Robinson, Mcdevit E R A. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 11973;1629–32.
6.
Gebuhr P, Soelberg M, Orsens T, Wilbek H. Naproxen prevention of heterotopic ossification after hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;(3):226–9.
7.
Lindholm TS, Viljaka T, Vanka E, Popov L, Lindholm TC. Development of heterotopic ossification around the hip. A longterm follow-up of patients who underwent surgery with two different types of endoprostheses. Arch Orthop And Traumat Surg. 1986;263–7.
8.
Nolan DR, Fitzgerald RH, Beckenbaugh R, Coventry M. Complications of total hip arthroplasty treated by reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg. 1975;977–81.
9.
Schmidt SA, Kjarsgaard-Andersen P, Pedersen N, Kristensen S, Pedersen P, Nielsen JB. The use of Indhomethacin to prevent the formation of heterotopic bone after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988;70–834.
10.
Schaeffer M, Sosner J. Heterotopic ossification: Treatment of established bone with radiation therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;284–6.
11.
Fichtner M. Magnetic field therapy in physical therapy. Biophysics and medicine report. 1990;
12.
Mihajlović V. Terapijski fizikalni modaliteti, četvrto izdanje, Unireks,Podgorica. 2011;
13.
Fichtner M. Magnetic field therapy in practice, Brochure about the elec. system pulsating magnetic field therapy. 1983;
14.
Park KH, Soda A, Yamaguchi H, Kinouchi Y. Effects of elf magnetic fields on collagen synthesis in osteoblast. Bresani F. 1999;853–5.
15.
Null G, Koestller VR. Healing with magnets. 1988;
16.
Jevtić M, Vesović-Potić V. Fizikalna medicina, Medicinski fakultet. 1997;

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by