The importance of functional hemispheric asymmetry in the assessment of cognitive evoked potentials and reaction time

Mirjana Dejanovic ,
Mirjana Dejanovic
Vesna Ivetic ,
Vesna Ivetic
Vojkan Nestorovic ,
Vojkan Nestorovic
Zvezdan Milanovic ,
Zvezdan Milanovic
Dragica Parlic ,
Dragica Parlic
Sonja Smiljic ,
Sonja Smiljic
Milanka Miletic
Milanka Miletic

Published: 01.06.2016.

Volume 45, Issue 2 (2016)

pp. 77-82;

https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed1602077d

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation of latency and amplitude of P300 cognitive potential and the degree of lateralization of brain hemispheres. The study included 60 subjects whose age was between 45 and 56 years. Bioelectric brain activity was recorded using argentum chloride (AgCl) electrodes that were placed at central line of the scalp (over Fz and Cz regions) according to the international 10-20 standard. P300 was generated using “oddball” paradigm with randomized stimuli: A frequent 1000 Hz tone with an occurrence of 80 % and a 2000 Hz tone (target) with a 20 % occurrence. The measurement is done with the right hand (first recording) and left hand (second recording). All subjects in this study were tested for usage lateralization and showed that they are right-handed. Based on the results of gestural lateralization subjects are divided in three groups. In the group with high degree of lateralization latencies of P300 were significantly lower when dominant hand was used in comparison to non-dominant hand, on Fz electrode (t = 4,162, p<0,01) and Cz electrode (t = 5,302, p<0,01 (p<0.01) and amplitudes of P300 were significantly higher, on Fz electrode (t=-2,725, p<0,05), on Cz electrode (t=2,527, p<0,05). However, there were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) for latencies and amplitudes of P300 between dominant and non-dominant hand for the group of subjects with weak and average degree of lateralization. In both subject groups, significantly faster RT was measured when dominant hand was used. The P300 cognitive potential and reaction time can contribute to the study of indicators of the functional hemispheric asymmetry of the brain.

Keywords

References

1.
Bourne V. Lateralised processing of positive facial emotion: sex differences in strength of hemispheric dominance. Neuropsychologia. 2005;(6):953–6.
2.
Cai Q, Van Der Haegen L, Brysbaert M. Complementary hemispheric specialization for language production and visuospatial attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;(4):322–30.
3.
Davidson R. Affect, cognition , and hemispheric specialization. 1984;320–65.
4.
Kosslyn S, Gazzaniga M, Galaburda A, Rabin C;, Zigmund M, Bloom F, et al. Hemisferic Specialization. 1999;1521–42.
5.
Bennys K, Portet F, Touchon J, Rondouin G. Diagnostic value of event-related evoked potentials N200 and P300 subcomponents in early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;405–12.
6.
Frodl T, Hampel H, Juckel G, Bürger K, Padberg F, Engel R, et al. Value of event-related P300 subcomponents in the clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease. Psychophysiology. 2002;(2):175–81.
7.
Golob E, Irimajiri R, Starr A. Auditory cortical activity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: relationship to subtype and conversion to dementia. Brain. 2007;740–52.
8.
Golob E, Johnson J, Starr A. Auditory event-related potentials during target detection are abnormal in mild cognitive impairment. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;151–61.
9.
Irimajiri R, Golob E, Starr A. Auditory brain-stem, middle-and long-latency evoked potentials in mild cognitive impairment. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;1918–29.
10.
Bach S, Brandeis D, Hofstetter C, Martin E, Richardson U, Brem S. Early emergence of deviant frontal fMRI activity for phonological processes in poor beginning readers. Neuroimage. 2010;(2):682–93.
11.
Chiarello C, Welcome S, Halderman L, Leonard C. Does degree of asymmetry relate to performance? An investigation of word recognition and reading in consistent and mixed handers. Brain Cogn. 2009;(3):521–30.
12.
Lust J. Driving performance during word generation-testing the function of human brain lateralization using fTCD in an ecologically relevant context. Neuropsychologia. 2011;(9):2375–83.
13.
Van Ettinger-Veenstra H, Ragnehed M, Hällgren M, Karlsson T, Landtblom T, Lundberg A, et al. Right-hemispheric brain activation correlates to language performance. Neuroimage. 2010;(4):3481–8.
14.
Duncan C, Barry R, Connolly J, Fischer C, Michie P, Näätänen R, et al. Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;1883–908.
15.
Team C, R. A language and environment for statistical computing.
16.
Annett. Hand preference observed in large healthy samples: classification, norms and interpretations of increased non-righthandedness by the right shift theory. Br J Psychol. 2004;339–53.
17.
Pulves D, White L, Andrews T. Manual asimetry and handedness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 1994;(11):5030–2.
18.
Sommer I, Aleman A, Somers M, Boks M, Kahn R. Sex differences in handedness, asymmetry of the planum temporale and functional language lateralization. Brain Res. 2008;76–88.
19.
Fjell A, Walhovd K. P300 and neuropsychological tests as measures of aging: scalp topography and cognitive changes. Brain Topog. 2001;(1):25–40.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by