VARIATIONS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAXILLAAND MANDIBLE st nd rd TO CRANIAL BASE IN PERSON WITH 1 , 2 AND 3 CLASS BY ANGLE

V. Vukićević ,
V. Vukićević

Clinic of Stomatology , Medical faculty Pristina , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

J. Pavlović ,
J. Pavlović

Clinic of Stomatology , Medical faculty Pristina , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

A. Vujačić ,
A. Vujačić

Clinic of Stomatology , Medical faculty Pristina , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

S. Simić
S. Simić

Clinic of Stomatology , Medical faculty Pristina , Kosovska Mitrovica , Kosovo*

Published: 01.01.2007.

Volume 35, Issue 1 (2007)

pp. 83-87;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed200701183V

Abstract

Introduction: In 1899. Angle introduced his own classification of malocclusions which was established anteroposterior relationship between maxilla and mandible.Later cephalometric examinations showed possible variations of the relationship between maxilla and mandible to cranial base, in all three classes. The aim work: The aim of this work was to ascertain types of the relationship between maxilla and mandible to cranial base in persons with I,II and III class by Angle. Material and method:The profile telerendgenograms were used in male and female aged aprroximately 14,5 years. On the bases of clinical examination and analysis of models,the patients were previously distributed into three groups with 50 examinees in each,according to Angle classification of malocclusions in saggital plain.SNAand SNB angle were analysed, and on the bases were individual values, the type of the relation between maxilla and mandible to cranial base was determined for every examinee. Results: In persons with Angle I class, eight types of the relationship were determined,while five types in persons with Angle II and III class of the relationship of jaw to cranial base. Conclusion: Because of large number of variationsof the relationship of jaw to cranial base diagnostic procedure should evolve, and treatment of the very similar cases should be different

Keywords

References

1.
H AE. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos. 41:248–64.
2.
S. CJ, W SB. Dental and skeletal variation within the range of normal. Angle Orthod. 54:5–17.
3.
P CH. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod. 92(117).
4.
L. CJ, B. D, C. C, K G. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible. Eur J Orthod. 27:568–78.
5.
B DW. Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 34:812–40.
6.
K. JY, L. SJ, K. TW, Dong-Seok N. YIIC. Classification of the skeletal variation in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 74:303–11.
7.
Marković M. Biološka priroda ortodoncije. Ortodontska sekcija Srbije.
8.
M. M, Ortodoncija. Medicinska Knjiga.
9.
E. MR, L BF. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 75:599–617.
10.
A RR. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium. Angle Orthod. 22:142–5.
11.
Rusić-Tasić V. Skeletne varijacije kod dece sa II/1. Bilten udruženja ortodonata Jugoslavije. 23(1):27–32.
12.
C SC. Cephalometrics for you and me. AJO. 29:729–55.
13.
C SC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 29:8–29.
14.
F. VF, S. G, C. V, M. M, S C. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: A preliminary regression study. Angle Orthod. 72:579–84.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by