DIABETIC NEPHROP IABETIC NEPHROPATHIA AND ACE INHIBIT ACE INHIBITORS

T. Novaković ,
T. Novaković

Internal ternal clinic, Medical faculty Pristina , Коsоvsка Мitrovica , Kosovo*

S. Jovanović ,
S. Jovanović

Internal ternal clinic, Medical faculty Pristina , Коsоvsка Мitrovica , Kosovo*

S. Sovtić ,
S. Sovtić

Internal ternal clinic, Medical faculty Pristina , Коsоvsка Мitrovica , Kosovo*

S. Pajović ,
S. Pajović

Internal ternal clinic, Medical faculty Pristina , Коsоvsка Мitrovica , Kosovo*

R. Stolić
R. Stolić

Internal ternal clinic, Medical faculty Pristina , Коsоvsка Мitrovica , Kosovo*

Published: 01.01.2006.

Volume 34, Issue 1 (2006)

pp. 79-85;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed200601139N

Abstract

Diabetes is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease .in United States , Europa and Japan. Approximately 40% of patients with type 1 diabetes and 5-15% of patients with type 2 diabetes eventually develop end-stage renal disease. Risk factors for development of diabetic nephropathy include hyperglycemia, hypertension, positive family history of nephropathy and hypertension, and smoking. Key elements in the primary care of diabetes include glycemic control, blood pressure control, and screening for microalbuminuria. In general, the goal for glycemic control is a blood glucose level as close to normal (HbA C <7%) . Blood pressure control is at least as important as glucose control, especially after the onset of 1 renal damage, and blood pressure should be consistently <130/85. Screening for diabetic nephropathy involves monitoring at least yearly for urinary albumin excretion >30 mg per day. Microalbuminuria is defined as the urinary excretion of 30300 mg of albumin per day. Both glycemic control and rigorous control of blood pressure have significant impact on prevention and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Identification of patients with microalbuminuria selects a population of patients with increased mortality. Microalbuminuria screening should begin at the time of diagnosis. ACE inhibitors should be used when microalbuminuria is present regardless of the presence or absence of hypertension in type 1 diabetes and are widely.
used in normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes, as well.The effect of ACE inhibitors is probably not only via lowered
systemic blood pressure but also via direct effects on intraglomerular hemodynamics. 

Keywords

References

1.
Adedapo KS, Abbiyesuku FM, Adedapo AD. Microalbuminuria in controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Afr J Med Med Sci. 30:323–6.
2.
Evans TC, Capell P. Diabetic nephropathy. Clinical Diabetes. 18(1):1–7.
3.
Vasan S, Foiles PG, Founds HW. Therapeutic potential of AGE inhibitors and breakers of AGE protein cross-links. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 10:1977–87.
4.
5.
Yokota T, Utsunomiya K, Murakawa Y, Kurata H, Tajima N. Mechanism of preventive effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor on diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 56(Suppl 71).
6.
Mogensen CE, Neldam S, Tikkanen I, Oren S, Viskoper R, Watts RW, et al. Randomised controlled trial of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system in patients with hypertension, microalbuminuria, and non-insulin dependent diabetes: the candesartan and lisinopril microalbuminuria (CALM) study. BMJ. 321:1440–4.
7.
Palmer BF. Renal dysfunction complicating the treatment of hypertension. N Engl J Med. 347:1256–61.
8.
Group UKPDS. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 352:837–53.
9.
Đurić D. Ateroskleroza, faktori rizika, patogeneza, terapija, prevencija.
10.
Lj Đ. Lečenje hronične insuficijencije bubrega u dijabetesnoj nefropatiji. In: Diabetes mellitus, Inovacije znanja X. p. 201–7.
11.
Mogensen CE. Hypertension and diabetes. 2.
12.
Zamaklar M. Etiopatogeneza dijabetesne mikroangiopatije. In: Diabetes mellitus, Inovacije znanja. p. 171–80.
13.
Varghese A, Deepa R, Rema M. Prevalence of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes mellitus at a diabetes centre in southern India. Postgrad Med J. 77:399–402.
14.
Harvey JN, Rizvi K, Craney L. Population-based study and analysis of trends in the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Med. 18:998–1002.
15.
Adler AI, Stevens RJ, Manley SE. Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64. Kidney Int. 63:225–32.
16.
Forsblom CM, Groop PH, Groop LC. Predictive value of microalbuminuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes of long duration. BMJ. 305:105–13.
17.
Arun C, Stiddart J, Mackin P. Significance of microalbuminuria in long-duration type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 26(2149).
18.
Perkins B, Ficociello LH, Silva KH. Regression of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 348:2285–93.
19.
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group. Effect of intensive therapy on the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Kidney Int. 47:1703–20.
20.
Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO HOPE substudy. Lancet. 355:253–9.
21.
Augustine Y, Vidt DG. Diabetic nephropathy. In: The Cleveland Clinic.
22.
Hovind P, Tarnow L, Rossing K. Decreasing incidence of severe diabetic microangiopathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 26:1258–64.
23.
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 329:977–86.
24.
Fronzo RA. Diabetic nephropathy: etiologic and therapeutic considerations. Diabetes Rev. 3:510–64.
25.
Lalić N. Dijabetesna nefropatija u dijabetološkoj praksi. In: Diabetes mellitus, Inovacije znanja X. p. 195–200.
26.
Đjordjević P. Praktični i bazični problemi dijabetologije i bolesti metabolizma. In: Inovacije znanja XI.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by