BARIUM ENEMA AND CHRONIC APPENDICITIS

M. Vuković ,
M. Vuković

Clinical Center Novi Sad, Institute of surgery, Clinic for abdominal and endocrine surgery Serbia

N. Moljević ,
N. Moljević

Clinical Center Novi Sad, Institute of surgery, Clinic for abdominal and endocrine surgery Serbia

S. Sekulić ,
S. Sekulić

Emergency Surgical Centre “Simonida” - Gračanica Bosnia and Herzegovina

D. Krivokuća
D. Krivokuća

Department of Anathomy, Medical faculty Novi Sad Serbia

Published: 01.12.2004.

Volume 32, Issue 2 (2004)

pp. 25-29;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed200402089V

Abstract

Chronic appendicitis presents inflammation of appendix with atypical clinical findings, without significant signs
and symptoms. Because of that diagnosing chronic appendicitis presumes a great problem. Indications for operative treatment based on clinical impression are followed with a great number of unnecessary appendectomies. Barium enema can show morphlogic changes of appendix during its chronic inflammation. Our aim was to show values of barium enema in diagnosing chronic appendicitis. Study went prospectively, in period 1999-2001 on Clinic for abdominal and endocrine
surgery, Institute for surgery Novi Sad. It includes 100 patients with symptoms, 50 of them were operated after barium
enema, and other 50 were operated after clinical impression of surgeon. Each appendix was patohistologicaly examined.
Incidental appendectoies were exluded. Of total 1425 appendectomies in three years period, 100 were operatde because of chronic appendicitis. Fifty of them were operated after barium enema, and other 50 were operated after clinical impression of surgeon. Range of years was 15 59 in examined group with average 35,6 years. In control group range was 15 57, with average 32,9 years. Lasting of pain episode more than 12 hours had 94% of patients in examined group, and 72% of patients in control group had painn less than 24 hourrs. During of pain episodes at 92% of patients from examined group was 3 weeks to 12 months, and 86% of patients from control group had pain standing 3-36 weeks. The most common sign on barium enema was finding of coprolites in lumen (52%), followed with unfilled appendix (18%, angulations (10%), distal amputation (8%), segmentation of contrast (8%), and fixated appendix (4%). Intraoperative macroscopic findings were as followed: 40/50 coprolites in lumen, 7/50 fibrous bounds, and 3/50 fibroses of appendix. Patohistologicaly, chronic appendicitis was confirmed at 90% of patients in examined group, and 58% in control group. After surgery, 94% of patients from examined group don't feel the preoperative pain. Barium enema significantly increases of chronic appendicitis. It is non-invasive, and reliable method for showing morphologic changes of chronic appendix. Use of barium enema dereases number of unnecessary appendectomies. Barium enema is suggested for evaluation of patients with chronic pain in right lower quadrant of abdomen, and thereby for diagnosing of chronic appendicitis. 

Keywords

References

1.
Savrin RA, Clausen K, Martin EW, Cooperman M. Chronic and recurrent appendicitis. Am J Surg. 137:355–7.
2.
Volobuyev NN, Shpilevoi AI, Volobuyeva EN, Cheripko ON. Clinico-morphological parallels in chronic appendicitis. Klin Khir. 2:26–7.
3.
Popp LW. Gynecologically indicated single-endoloop laparoscopic appendectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 5(3):275–81.
4.
Stroh C, Rauch J, Schramm H. Is there a chronic appendicitis in childhood? Analysis of pediatric surgical patients from 1993-1997. Zentralbl Chir. 124(12):1098–102.
5.
Rao PM, Rhea JT. The computed tomography appearance of recurrent and chronic appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med. 16:26–33.
6.
Goldman M. The radiological investigations of recurrent appendicitis. Clin Radiol. 17:289–94.
7.
Schisgall RM. Appendiceal colic in childhood: The role of impacted casts of stool within the appendix. Am Surg. 192:687–93.
8.
Jona JZ, Belin RP, Selke AC. Barium enema as a diagnostic aid in children with abdominal pain. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 144:351–5.
9.
Homer JM, Braver JM. Recurrent appendicitis: Reexamination of a controversial disease. Gastrointest Radiol. 4:295–301.
10.
Crabbe MM, Norwood SH, Robertson HD, Silva JS. Recurrent and chronic appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 163:11–3.
11.
Carnett JB, Boles RS. Fallacies concerning chronic appendicitis. JAMA. 91:1679.
12.
Leardi S, Delmonaco S, Ventura T, Chiominto A, Rubeis G, Simi M. Dolore abdominale ricorrente e “appendicite cronica.” Minerva Chirurgica. 55(1–2):39–44.
13.
Stroh C, Rauch J, Schramm H. Is there a chronic appendicitis in childhood? Analysis of pediatric surgical patients from 1993-1997. Zentralbl Chir. 124(12):1098–102.
14.
Butsch DW, Jothi R, Butsch WL, Butsch JL. Recurrent appendicitis: Fact not fallacy. Postgrad Med. 54(4):132–7.
15.
Rajogopalan AE, Mason JH, Kennedy M, Pawlikowski J. The value of the barium enema in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 112:531–3.
16.
Sakover RP, DelFava RL. Frequency of visualisation of the normal appendix with the barium enema examination. AJR. 121:312–7.
17.
Lewis FR, Holcroft JW, Boey J, Dunphy JE. Appendicitis: A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1000 cases. Arch Surg. 110:677–84.
18.
EB G. Chronic appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 146:596–8.
19.
Alvarez WC. When should one operate for “chronic appendicitis”? JAMA. 114:1301.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by