More articles from Volume 43, Issue 1, 2014
PROGNOSTIČKI ZNAČAJ GLEASON SCORE-A 7 (3+4) I GLEASON SCORE-A 7 (4+3) U ADENOKARCINOMU PROSTATE U ODNOSU NA KLINIČKI STADIJUM, TKIVNI ANDROGEN STATUS I STEPEN NEUROENDOKRINE DIFERENCIJACIJE
KLINIČKE MANIFESTACIJE OSTEOARTRITISA KOLENIH ZGLOBOVA
DNA identification of war and mass catastrophies victims
Electrocardiography changes in patients with acute myocardial infarction in late hospital phase
SINDROM OPSTRUKCIONE APNEJE U SPAVANJU KOD DECE
Electrocardiography changes in patients with acute myocardial infarction in late hospital phase
,
Z. Marcetic
,
S. Sovtic
,
M. Sipic
,
V. Peric
S. Lazic
Abstract
References
1.
Stožinić S, Lambić I, Babić M. Akutni koronarni sindromi. Nauka. 1996;
2.
Hogg K, Hornug R, Howie C. Electrocardiographic prediction of coronary artery patency after thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: use of the ST segment as a noninvasive marker. Br Heart J. 1988;275–80.
3.
Sarah R, Been M, Furniss S. Reduction in ST segment elevation after thrombolysis predicts either coronary perfusion or preservation of left ventricular function. Br Heart J. 1990;113–7.
4.
Gore J, Roberts R, Ball S. Peak creatine kineases a measure of effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987;1234–8.
5.
Vasiljević Z. Akutni koronarni sindrom. Kardiologija Ur Ostojić M, Kanjuh V, Beleslin B Zavod za udžbenike. 2012;423–64.
6.
Vasiljević Z, Krljanac G, Novaković A, Lazarević K. Akutni koronarni sindrom bez ST-elevacije: nestabilna angina pectoris i infarkt miokarda bez ST-elevacije. Kardiologija Ur Ostojić M, Kanjuh V, Beleslin B Zavod za udžbenike. 2012;449–64.
7.
Sato H, Kodoma K, Nanto S. Abrupt augmentation of ST segment elevation as a marker of successful coronary thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1978;1096–103.
8.
Furberg C. Clinical value of intracoronary Streptokinase. Am J Cardiol. 1984;626–7.
9.
Yusuf S, Collins R, Peto R. Intravenous and intracoronary fibrinolitic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: Overview of results on mortality, reinfarction and side-effects from 33 randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 1985;556–85.
10.
Essen V, Schmidt R, Uebis W, R. Myocardial infarction and thrombolysis. Electrocardiographic short term and long term results using precordial mapping. Br Heart J. 1985;6–10.
11.
Krucoff M, Green C, Satler L. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery potency using continuous ST segment monitoring. Am J Cardiol. 1986;916–22.
12.
Blanke H, Scherff F, Karsch K. Electrocardiographic changes after streptokinase induced recanalisation in patients with acute left anterior descendending artery obstruction. Circulation. 1983;406–12.
13.
Anderson L, Marshall W, Askins C. A randomized trial of intravenous and intracoronary streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1984;606–18.
14.
Haisty W. Performance of the automated complete Selvester QRS scoring system in normal subjects and patients with single and multiple myocardial infarctions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;341–6.
15.
Hindman N. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. Am J Cardiol. 1985;1485–90.
16.
Wagner G. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size I. Specificity and observer agreement. Circulation. 1982;342–7.
17.
Pope J. Development and validation of an automated method of the Selvester QRS scoring system for myocardial infarct size. Am J Cardiol. 1988;734–8.
18.
Depace L, Abdulmassih S, A-Hamid H. Use of QRS scoring system and Thallium-201 scintigraphy to assess left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1982;1262–8.
19.
Palmeri T, Harrison D, Cobb R. A QRS scoring system for assessing left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1982;(1):4–9.
20.
Seino Y. Evaluation of QRS scoring system in acute myocardial infarction: Relation to infarct size early stage left ventricular ejection fraction and exercise performance. Am J Cardiol. 1985;753–6.
21.
Handler E, Ellam S, Maisey M. Use of an exercise QRS score and radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction in assessing prognosis after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1987;243–53.
22.
Ideker R, Wagner G, Ruth W. Evaluation of QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size II. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for anterior infarcts. Am J Cardiol. 1982;1604–14.
23.
Simin N. Korelacija ehokardiografskog i elektrokardiografskog QRS skora u proceni prostranstva postinfarktnog ožiljka u miokardu. Sprski arhiv -Kardiologija. 1985;295–317.
24.
Ideker R, Behar V, Wagner G. Evaluation of asynergy as an indicator of myocardial fibrosis. Circulation. 1978;715–25.
25.
Field B, Russell R, Dowling J. Regional left ventricular performance in the year following myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1972;679–89.
26.
Fioretti P. Limitations of a QRS scoring system to assess left ventricular function and prognosis at hospital discharge after myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1985;248–52.
27.
Mikell F, Petrovich J, Snyder M. Reliability of Q-wave formation and QRS score in predicting regional and global left ventricular performance in acute myocardial infarction with successful reperfusion. Am J Cardiol. 1986;923–6.
28.
Jolly S, Kane W, Barlie M. Reduction of reperfusion injury after canine myocardial ischemia by superoxide dismutase plus catalase. Circulation. 1984;185.
29.
Christian T. Limitations of electrocardiogram in estimating infarction size following acute reperfusion therapy for myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1991;264–70.
30.
Defayter P. Effects of spontaneous and streptocinase-induced recanalisation on left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1983;1039.
31.
Dewood M. Prevalence and significance of spontaneous thrombolysis in transmural myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1985;33.
32.
Hasche E. QRS score and infarct size (response). Circulation. 1996;1257–89.
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
Google scholar:
See link
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
