Effects of environmental tobacco smoke on peak expiratory flow rates on healthy school children

Zorica Vujnovic-Zivkovic ,
Zorica Vujnovic-Zivkovic
Dragana Stamatovic ,
Dragana Stamatovic
Ljiljana Sulovic ,
Ljiljana Sulovic
Jovan Zivkovic ,
Jovan Zivkovic
Aleksandra Ilic
Aleksandra Ilic

Published: 01.01.2016.

Volume 45, Issue 1 (2016)

pp. 63-67;

https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed1601063v

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco smoke is one of the most important environmental pollutants (ETS). Passive exposure to tobacco smoke is involuntary and it presents a health risk for children. Objective: To establish if there are differences in Peak Expiratory Flow Rates (PEF) values of healthy school children who live in households with and without tobacco smoke. Methods: PEF measurements were taken for 830 school children, from elementary schools in Nis and Laplje Selo. Mesurements were obtained with new peakflowmetars Vitalograf-normal range (EN 13826), 3 to 5 times. The higest values were taken for analysis. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: We considered PEF values for 830 healthy school children, 599 (72.17%) from households with tobacco smoke (ETS), and 231 (27.83%) without ETS. Exposure to parenteral smoking was associated with reduced PEF rates: 312.01 L/min (95% CI=301.38-322.65 L/min), for boys and 284.64 L/min (95% CI=275.73-293.55 L/min), for girls. PEF rates for children from households without ETS are 313.79 L/min (95% CI=295.63-331.93 L/min) for boys, and 302.0 L/min (95% CI=287.02- 316.98 L/min) for girls. PEF rates were significantly lower for girls from households with ETS (p<0.05). Boys, with and without ETS, had no statistically significant differences between their height, weight and age, so their PEF rates could be compared by their absolute values. For girls, this was not the case, and after age, height and weight adjustments their PEF rates showed no statistical significance (p= 0,346). Conclusions: Parental and household smoking were associated with decreased lung function in school age children. Although it's possible to reduce exposure to tobacco smoke in public places, it's important to inform parents about longterm impact of tobacco smoke on the health of their children.

Keywords

References

1.
Proposed identification of environmental tobacco smoke as a toxic contaminant. 2005;
2.
Cigarette smoking and health. AM J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;861–5.
3.
International consultation on environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and child health. 1999;
4.
Hawamdeh A. Effects of passive smoking on children,s health: a revieew. Eastern Mediterranean Health Joournal. 2003;(3).
5.
Strachan D, Jarvis M, Feyerbend C. Passive smoking, salivary cotinine concentracion and middle ear effusion in 7 year old children. British medical journal. 1989;1549–52.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by