More articles from Volume 44, Issue 4, 2015
Effects of the toluene and methanol extract of Senna (Cassia angustifolia Vahl) on viability and proliferation HeLa cells
Mechanisms of injury of pedestrians in road traffic accidents
Significance of echotomography in the diagnostic algorithm for acute pyelonephritis and glomerulonephritis
Chemical risk factors responsible for the formation of wedge-shaped lesions
The concentration of adrenaline and noradrenaline in the serum of dogs under the influence of calcium channels blockers
Our experience with the surgical treatment of appendicitis
Abstract
Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical disease in the pathology of the population. Incidence in the general population is 6%. In the period from 15.01.2002 to 08.16.2014 as any 627 appendix which je12,4% of the 5055 total patients. Prevalent patients males 55.5% compared to 44.5% female. According to the age of the children present in 393 (68.47%) and 181 adults (31.53%). The greatest incidence is in children aged age group of 15-20 years, 131 (23.06%). In the adult group the highest incidence is represented in the third decade of 21-30 years, with 77 (13.4%). The most common disease of acute appendicitis is in the second decade of the 258 cases (44.9%). Intraoperative pathomorphologically highest incidence wearing Appendicitis phlegmonosa with 317 (52.1%). Peritonitis acuta is the most common complication of severe forms of appendicitis acuta 231 (71.96%). Anterograde apendectomia was performed in 532 (87.5%) patients and retrograde in 76 (12.5%). Abdominal drainage procedures were performed in 145 (23.85%) patients. Postoperative complications 6 (4.68%). Surgical wound infection 4. Fistula appendicularis 1 (3.12%). Mortality 1 (0.16%).
Keywords
References
Citation
Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.