The tests were made at deparment of infertility at the Gynecology and Obstretics Institute of Clinical Center of Serbia in the period from 01.01. untill 31.12.1998. The three hundred patients, on which hysterosalpingography (HSG) was made, and patients, on which chromolaparoscopy was made, were involved by prospectus studies. In the laparoscopy the larger anomalies of the uterus and significant hypoplasy coincide with HSG finding, while hypoplasy in the lower level or uterus arcuatus always can not be established by laparoscopy.The higher frequency of all pathological alterations of the uterus, except the myoma of the uterus, was established by HSG, relating to laparoscopy. Associate pathological alterations were established in the higher percent by HSG than by the laparoscopy, while the single changes were diagnosed in the lower percent.The deficit in the loading of the uterus by the constrast medium, also the changes at the endometrium, could be proved by HSG only. Intravasation can be identified by the both methods. In the diagnosis of the myoma of the uterus, laparoscopy is more important method than HSG.Pathological alterations of the uterus, especially higher anomalies of the uterus and hypoplasy were established in the higher percent by HSG than by the laparoscopy, but statistically the more significant difference was not established in the application of the both methods

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.