Self-assessment health state of adults in Kosovo and Metohia

Jovana Milošević ,
Jovana Milošević
Aleksandra Ilić ,
Aleksandra Ilić
Slađana Đurić ,
Slađana Đurić
Danijela Ilić ,
Danijela Ilić
Nenad Milošević
Nenad Milošević

Published: 01.12.2017.

Volume 47, Issue 1 (2018)

pp. 37-41;

https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed1802037m

Abstract

Introduction: A self-assessment health condition provides a general approach to creating a picture of the health status of the population. Aim: The aim of the paper is to show the connection between different categories of self-assessed health with socio-demographic characteristics, risk factors and with the presence of one or more chronic non-communicable disease of adults in Serbian communities in Kosovo and Metohia. Method: The research was carried out as a cross section study. As an instrument for data collection, the questionnaire was applied in the 2013 Survey of the Health of the Population of Serbia (excluding Kosovo and Metohija), which is in line with the European Health Research Questionnaire. For the purposes of our research, the following variables were used; gender, age, education, working status, marital status, the presence of chronic non-communicable diseases, smoking, alcohol use and physical activity. Results: A total of 1067 respondents (51.3% of women) responded, with an average age of 42.2 (± 16.0) years. Most respondents in the survey found that they feel very good or good, a quarter of the middle (not bad or good), while their condition was poor or very poor assessed by just under 5% of respondents. Among the respondents who rated their health condition as poor or very poor, there were significantly more female respondents, middle age and 65 years of age. Also, people with primary and secondary education, economically inactive, and who are inclined to the sedentary way of life, have a poor picture of their health. The frequency of people who assess their health status as bad or very bad is the highest among respondents with two or more chronic diseases. Conclusion: Different categories of self-assessment health show a tendency to connect with different individual characteristics of adult respondents. Our results can help in creating a strategy of action and building preventive programs in a defined area.

Keywords

References

1.
MISSING SURNAME. Do health behaviour and psychosocial risk factors explain the European East-West gap in health status? The European Journal of Public Health. 2001;11(1):65–73.
2.
Theme Filha MM, Souza Junior PRB de, Damacena GN, Szwarcwald CL. Prevalência de doenças crônicas não transmissíveis e associação com autoavaliação de saúde: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia. 2015;18(suppl 2):83–96.
3.
L.J. P, R.L. H, J.M B. Predictors of self-rated health status among Texas residents. 2005;
4.
Macintyre K. Rapid Assessment and Sample Surveys: Trade-Offs in Precision and Cost. Health Policy and Planning. 1999;14(4):363–73.
5.
Republike Srbije M. Istraživanje zdravlja stanovnika Republike Srbije. 2006.
6.
Republike Hrvatske M. Evropska zdravstvena anketa u Hrvatskoj 2014.-2015. 2016;
7.
Mirkovic M, Simic S. Predictors of self-rated health of citizens on the territory of endangered political security. Medical review. 2011;64(3–4):168–72.
8.
Organization WH. Comprehensive Global Monitoring Framework, Including Indicators and a Set of Voluntary Global targets for the Prevention and Control Noncommunicable Diseases. 2012.
9.
Mirković M. Procena zdravstvenog stanja stanovnika na socijalno-ekonomski i politički-bezbednosno ugroženoj teritoriji. Magistarska teza. 2008.
10.
Institut za javno zdravlje Srbije. In 2014.
11.
Organization WH. Basic Documents. 2003.
12.
Steptoe A, Wardle J. Health behaviour, risk awareness and emotional well-being in students from Eastern Europe and Western Europe. Social Science & Medicine. 2001;53(12):1621–30.
13.
Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AJR, Schaap MM, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M, et al. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in 22 European Countries. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;358(23):2468–81.
14.
Commission E. Health & consumer protection directorate-general. Strategy on European Community Health Indicators (ECHI) = the “Short List.” 2004.
15.
Benjamins MR, Hummer RA, Eberstein IW, Nam CB. Self-reported health and adult mortality risk: An analysis of cause-specific mortality. Social Science & Medicine. 2004;59(6):1297–306.
16.
Jylha M, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Jokela J, Heikkinen E. Is Self-Rated Health Comparable across Cultures and Genders? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 1998;53B(3):S144–52.
17.
Knight BG, Gatz M, Heller K, Bengtson VL. Age and emotional response to the Northridge earthquake: A longitudinal analysis. Psychology and Aging. 15(4):627–34.
18.
Theme Filha MM, Szwarcwald CL, Souza Junior PRB de. Medidas de morbidade referida e inter-relações com dimensões de saúde. Revista de Saúde Pública. 2008;42(1):73–81.
19.
Norris JC, Van der laan MJ, Lane S, Anderson JN, Block G. Nonlinearity in Demographic and Behavioral Determinants of Morbidity. Health Services Research. 2003;38(6p2):1791–818.
20.
Bhopal RS. Concepts in Epidemiology. 2002.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by