More articles from Volume 48, Issue 2, 2019
Histological characteristics and volume density of elastic fibers in the dermis during aging
The influence of phacoemulsification on corneal oedema in patients with glaucoma
Examination of the impact of characteristics of the health issues, length of time since themyocardial infarction and comorbidity to the quality of life of diseased of myocardial infarction
Risk factors for postpartum depression in the early postpartum period
Vestibular nerve schwannoma, treated with gamma knife and diagnosed after transitory ischemic attack in posterior cerebral vascularisation
The influence of phacoemulsification on corneal oedema in patients with glaucoma
,
Ivan Bogosavljević
,
Ivan Marjanović
,
Miloš Gašić
,
Marija Božić
,
Vesna Marić
,
Jana Mirković
,
Mona Varga
,
Milena Šaranović
Miroslav Jeremić
Abstract
References
1.
Introduction to glaucoma: Terminology Epidemiology and Heredity. Basic and clinical science course sec 10. Vols. 2011-3–15. 2012.
2.
Shih CY. Clinical Significance of Central Corneal Thickness in the Managementof Glaucoma. Vol. 122, Archives of Ophthalmology. 2004. p. 1270.
3.
Bovelle R. Corneal Thickness Measurements With the Topcon SP-2000P Specular Microscope and an Ultrasound Pachymeter. Vol. 117, Archives of Ophthalmology. 1999. p. 868.
4.
Cockburn DM. Effects of corneal thickness on IOP measurement. Vol. 87, Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2004. p. 185–6.
5.
Orengo-Nania S, La Rosa F, Gross R. CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS OF CAUCASIANS AND AFRICAN AMERICANS IN GLAUCOMATOUS AND NON—GLAUCOMATOUS POPULATIONS. Vol. 9, Journal of Glaucoma. 2000. p. 103.
6.
Gizachew Z, Mulugeta A. Central corneal thickness among glaucoma patients attending Menelik II Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Vol. 32. 2018. p. 54–9.
7.
Maric V, Markovic V, Bozic M, Marjanovic I. Central corneal thickness, corneal curvature and refractive error in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Vol. 44, Praxis medica. 2015. p. 67–72.
8.
Herndon LW. Central Corneal Thickness in Normal, Glaucomatous, and Ocular Hypertensive Eyes. Vol. 115, Archives of Ophthalmology. 1997. p. 1137.
9.
Copt RP. Corneal Thickness in Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-angle Glaucoma, and Normal Tension Glaucoma. Vol. 117, Archives of Ophthalmology. 1999. p. 14.
10.
Morad Y, Sharon E, Hefetz L, Nemet P. Corneal thickness and curvature in normal-tension glaucoma. Vol. 125, American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1998. p. 164–8.
11.
Hashemian H, Lin S, Moghimi S, Torabi H, Amini H. Central corneal thickness in primary angle closure and open angle glaucoma. Vol. 9, Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 2014. p. 439.
12.
Wu L. Central Corneal Thickness of Normal Tension Glaucoma Patients in Japan. Vol. 44, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology. 2000. p. 643–7.
13.
Realini T, Gurka MJ, Weinreb RN. Reproducibility of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements in Healthy and Glaucomatous Eyes. Vol. 26, Journal of Glaucoma. 2017. p. 787–91.
14.
Kotecha A, Crabb DP, Spratt A, Garway-Heath DF. The Relationship between Diurnal Variations in Intraocular Pressure Measurements and Central Corneal Thickness and Corneal Hysteresis. Vol. 50, Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2009. p. 4229.
15.
Oncel B, Dinc UA, Gorgun E, Ilgaz Yalvaç B. Diurnal Variation of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure in Normal Subjects. Vol. 19, European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009. p. 798–803.
16.
Villas-Bôas FS, Doi LM, Sousa AKS, Melo Jr. LAS. Correlation between diurnal variation of intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude and corneal structural properties. Vol. 72, Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia. p. 296–301.
17.
Shah S, Spedding C, Bhojwani R, Kwartz J, Henson D, McLeod D. Assessment of the diurnal variation in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for patients with suspected glaucoma. Vol. 107, Ophthalmology. 2000. p. 1191–3.
18.
Kim HY, Budenz DL, Lee PS, Feuer WJ, Barton K. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography vs Ultrasound Pachymetry. Vol. 145, American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008. p. 228-232.e1.
19.
Elgin U, Şen E, Şimşek T, Tekin K, Yılmazbaş P. Early Postoperative Effects of Cataract Surgery on Anterior Segment Parameters in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Vol. 46, Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi. 2016. p. 95–8.
20.
Ramesh PV, Jha KN, Srikanth K. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Ultrasound Pachymetry. Vol. 11(8. 2017. p. 08–11.
21.
Kuerten D, Plange N, Koch EC, Koutsonas A, Walter P, Fuest M. Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera, and anterior segment OCT. Vol. 253, Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2015. p. 1105–9.
22.
Kandarakis A, Soumplis V, Karampelas M, Koutroumanos I, Panos C, Kandarakis S, et al. Response of corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness following clear corneal cataract surgery. Vol. 90, Acta Ophthalmologica. 2012. p. 526–9.
23.
López-Miguel A, Sanchidrián M, Fernández I, Holgueras A, Maldonado MJ. Comparison of specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and after cataract surgery. Vol. 255, Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2017. p. 387–92.
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
Google scholar:
See link
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
