THE INFLUENCE OF PHACOEMULSIFICATION ON CORNEAL OEDEMA IN PATIENTS WITH GLAUCOMA

Ivan Bogosavljević ,
Ivan Bogosavljević

Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Mitrovica, Kosovo

Ivan Marjanović ,
Ivan Marjanović

Eye Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Miloš Gašić ,
Miloš Gašić

Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Mitrovica, Kosovo

Marija Božić ,
Marija Božić

Eye Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Vesna Marić ,
Vesna Marić

Eye Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Jana Mirković ,
Jana Mirković

Chair of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty, University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Mitrovica, Kosovo

Mona Varga ,
Mona Varga

General Medicine Clinic - Eurooptic, Belgrade, Serbia

Milena Šaranović ,
Milena Šaranović

Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Mitrovica, Kosovo

Miroslav Jeremić
Miroslav Jeremić

Belgrade, Eye Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, Serbia

Published: 01.12.2019.

Volume 47, Issue 2 (2019)

pp. 9-14;

https://doi.org/10.70949/pramed201902426B

Abstract

Introduction: Glaucoma diagnosis is based on consideration of several factors, such as increased intraocular pressure (IOP), damage to the optical disc, and associated visual field loss. Evaluation of the integrity of the corneal endothelium and monitoring of the corneal thickness is indispensable during the preoperative preparation for phacoemulsification. These data are of great importance for later treatment and monitoring of early and late postoperative complications.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the central corneal thickness immediately before and after cataract surgery in patients with primary glaucoma (open and closed angle), comparing them with patients who do not have diagnosed glaucoma. Materials and methods: A prospective study covered a total of 159 subjects who performed cataract surgery by the method of phacoemulsification with the implantation of the intraocular lens in the posterior chamber at the Clinic for Eye Diseases at the Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade in 2017 and 2018. Pre-operative patients are classified into two groups. The first group with a primary glaucoma consisted of 71 respondents, with an open angle 41 with glaucoma, and a closed angle glaucoma 30. The second group consisted of people who did not have a diagnosed glaucoma, 88 of them. The central corneal thickness was measured using an ultrasound pachymeter. The measurements were made before the operation, 24 hours, 10 and 30 days after the operation, trying to get all done at the same time of day.

Results: Between patients without glaucoma (BG), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary glaucoma of closed angle (PACG), there is a statistically significant difference in median age (χ2 = 10.102; DF = 2; p = 0, 006). Among the observed groups there were statistically significant differences in the values measured preoperatively (χ2 = 10.265; DF = 2; p = 0.006). Among the observed groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the values measured in the first postoperative day (χ2 = 4.364; DF = 2; p = 0.099), nor in the 10th postoperative day (χ2 = 3.250; DF = 2; p = 0.197); 30 days after surgery (χ2 = 1.427; DF = 2; p = 0.490). In each of the groups individually, the appearance of oedema or a very statistically significant difference in the first and tenth postoperative day. Statistically significant difference was present 30 days after surgery, but far less compared to early postoperative period.

Conclusion: Based on the values obtained in this prospective study, we estimate that monitoring of corneal thickness has a mandatory place in the observation of patients after cataract surgery. We found that there is no difference in preoperative measurement only between groups without glaucoma and open angle glaucoma. Measurements performed in the first, tenth, thirtieth day do not differ in groups, but edema restitutin in the 30-th day was observed in all observed groups. 

Keywords

References

1.
Association TEMD. Introduction to glaucoma: Terminology, Epidemiology, and Heredity. In: Basic and Clinical Science Course, Sec 10. Vol. 2012, American Academy of Ophthalmology. p. 3–15.
2.
Shih CY, Graff Zivin JS, Trokel SL. Clinical significance of central corneal thickness in the management of glaucoma. Vol. 122, Arch Ophthalmol. p. 1270–5.
3.
Bovelle R, Kaufman SC, Thompson HW, Hamano H. Corneal thickness measurements with the Topcon SP-2000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter. Vol. 117, Arch Ophthalmol. p. 868–70.
4.
Cockburn DM. Effect of corneal thickness on IOP measurement. Vol. 87, Clin Exp Optom. p. 185–6.
5.
Rosa F, R G, S ON. Central corneal thickness of Caucasians and African-Americans in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous populations. Vol. 119, Arch Ophthalmol. p. 23–7.
6.
Gizachew Z, Mulugeta A. Central corneal thickness among glaucoma patients attending Menelik II Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Vol. 32, Ethiop J Health Dev. p. 54–9.
7.
Marić V, Marković V, Božić M, Marjanović I. Central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and refractive error in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Vol. 44, Praxis Medica. p. 67–72.
8.
Herndon LW, Choudhri SA, Cox T. Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. Vol. 115, Arch Ophthalmol. p. 1137–41.
9.
Copt RP, Thomas R, Mermoud A. Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension glaucoma. Vol. 117, Arch Ophthalmol. p. 14–6.
10.
Morad Y, Sharon E, Hefetz L. Corneal thickness and curvature in normal-tension glaucoma. Vol. 125, Am J Ophthalmol. p. 164–8.
11.
Moghimi S, Torabi H. Central corneal thickness in primary angle closure and open angle glaucoma. Vol. 9, J Ophthalmic Vis Res. p. 439–43.
12.
Wu LL, Suzuki Y, Ideta R, Araie M. Central corneal thickness of normal tension glaucoma patients in Japan. Vol. 44, Jpn J Ophthalmol. p. 643–7.
13.
Realini T, Gurka MJ, Weinreb RN. Reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Vol. 26, J Glaucoma. p. 787–91.
14.
Kotecha A, Crabb DP, Spratt A, Garway-Heath DF. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Vol. 50, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. p. 4229–36.
15.
Oncel B, Dinc UA, Gorgun E, Yalvac BI. Diurnal variation of corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure in normal subjects. Vol. 19, Eur J Ophthalmol. p. 798–803.
16.
Villas-Boas FS, Doi LM, Sousa AK, LA M. Correlation between diurnal variation of intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude, and corneal structural properties. Vol. 72, Arq Bras Oftalmol. p. 296–301.
17.
Shah S, Spedding C, Bhojwani R. Assessment of the diurnal variation in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for patients with suspected glaucoma. Vol. 107, Ophthalmology. p. 1191–3.
18.
Kim HY, Budenz DL, Lee PS, Feuer WJ, Barton K. Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography vs ultrasound pachymetry. Vol. 145, Am J Ophthalmol. p. 228–32.
19.
Elgin U, Sen E, Simsek T, Tekin K, Yılmazbas P. Early postoperative effects of cataract surgery on anterior segment parameters in primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Vol. 46, Turk J Ophthalmol. p. 95–8.
20.
Ramesh PV, Jha KN, Srikanth KG. Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound pachymetry. Vol. 11, J Clin Diagn Res. p. 08–11.
21.
Kuerten D, Plange N, Koch EC, Koutsonas A, Walter P, Fuest M. Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera, and anterior segment OCT. Vol. 253, Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2015. p. 1105–9.
22.
Kandarakis A, Soumplis V, Karampelas M. Response of corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness following clear corneal cataract surgery. Vol. 90, Acta Ophthalmol. p. 526–9.
23.
López-Miguel A, Sanchidrián M, Fernández I, Holgueras A, Maldonado MJ. Comparison of specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and after cataract surgery. Vol. 255, Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2017. p. 387–92.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by