Orthodontic treatment of a disto-occlusion with and favorable growth pattern

Dragana Ćorović ,
Dragana Ćorović
Amila Vujačić Orcid logo ,
Amila Vujačić
Vladanka Vukićević
Vladanka Vukićević

Published: 01.12.2020.

Volume 50, Issue 1 (2021)

pp. 13-17;

https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed2102013c

Abstract

The variety of etiological factors contributing to the development of distal bite various form, as well as the structures that are affected by the disorders determine the deegre of complexity of the malocclusion itself, and thus the choice of therapeutic procedure by which it will be treated. An 11-year-old female patient was diagnosed with this type of malocclusion with a certain degree of presence of other irregularities. After a detailed diagnostic procedure, and determining the type of growth, we approach the therapeutic procedure in two phases. By applying the funcional therapy in the first phase, we correct the vertical growth type, and then in the second phase of therapy using a fixed technique we achieve harmonious intermaxillary relations, an adequate molar and canine Class I relationship as well, thus improving the aesthetics of the patient's face.

References

1.
Pfeiffer JP, Grobéty D. The Class II malocclusion: Differential diagnosis and clinical application of activators, extraoral traction, and fixed appliances. Vol. 68, American Journal of Orthodontics. 1975. p. 499–544.
2.
Sharma A, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya B. Skeletal and Dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in Class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: A cephalometric study. Vol. 30, Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2012. p. 218.
3.
Brunelle JA, Bhat M, Lipton JA. Prevalence and Distribution of Selected Occlusal Characteristics in the US Population, 1988–1991. Vol. 75, Journal of Dental Research. 1996. p. 706–13.
4.
THILANDER B, MYRBERG N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Vol. 81, European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1973. p. 12–20.
5.
Helm S. Orthodontic treatment priorities in the Danish Child Dental Health Services. Vol. 10, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1982. p. 260–3.
6.
de Muνiz BR. Epidemiology of malocclusion in Argentine children. Vol. 14, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1986. p. 221–4.
7.
Barmes D. Dental and natural survey of primitive people in Central Africa. Vol. 38. 1993. p. 367–72.
8.
Homan BT, Davies GN. An oral health survey of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders in far North Queensland*. Vol. 18, Australian Dental Journal. 1973. p. 75–87.
9.
Tod MA, A.A. Taverne Prevalence of malocclusion traits in an Australian adult population. Vol. 15. 1997. p. 16–22.
10.
Kaur H, Pavithra U, Abraham R. Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in South Indian population. Vol. 3, Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2013. p. 97.
11.
Haupl KUS, ZB WL. 1949. p. 2.
12.
Rakosi G. Orthodontic and dentofacialOrthopedic treatment. 2010.
13.
Proffit WR, a. Contemporary orthodontics. 1993.
14.
Marković M. Ortodoncija I izdanje. 1982.
15.
Mossey PA. The Heritability of Malocclusion: Part 2. The Influence of Genetics in Malocclusion. Vol. 26, British Journal of Orthodontics. 1999. p. 195–203.
16.
AG. P, S.J.J. Orthopedically-induced growth-stimulating effecton human mandibule: new approach to decision - making. Vol. 2. 1997. p. 73–90.
17.
Veitz-Keenan A, Liu N. One phase or two phases orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion? Vol. 20, Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2019. p. 56–7.
18.
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Vol. 124, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2003. p. 234–43.
19.
Bj rk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Vol. 5, The European Journal of Orthodontics. 1983. p. 1–46.
20.
Flores-Mir C, PaulWMajor. Cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the Twin blok appliance in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients. A systematic review. Vol. 76. 2006. p. 876–81.
21.
Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, Taylor MG, King GJ. Effectiveness of early treatment of Class II malocclusion. Vol. 121, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2002. p. 9–17.
22.
Andrade A da S, Gavião MBD, Gameiro GH, Rossi MD. Characteristics of masticatory muscles in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Vol. 24, Brazilian Oral Research. 2010. p. 204–10.
23.
J. P, S. S, V V. Vujačić A.-Morfološke karakteristike malokluzije II klase. 2015.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by