More articles from Volume 50, Issue 1, 2021
A new scoring system for Covid-19 in patients on hemodialysis: Modified Early Warning score
Analysis of the occurrence, location and treatment of laryngeal carcinoma recurrence
Orthodontic treatment of a disto-occlusion with and favorable growth pattern
Sensory processing disorders in premature infants
Examination of early adaptation of newborns small for gestational age
Orthodontic treatment of a disto-occlusion with and favorable growth pattern
,
Dragana Ćorović
,
Amila Vujačić
Vladanka Vukićević
Abstract
References
1.
Rakosi G. Orthodontic and dentofacialOrthopedic treatment. 2010;
2.
J. P, S. S, V V. Vujačić A.-Morfološke karakteristike malokluzije II klase. 2015;
3.
Andrade A da S, Gavião MBD, Gameiro GH, Rossi MD. Characteristics of masticatory muscles in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Brazilian Oral Research. 2010;24(2):204–10.
4.
Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, Taylor MG, King GJ. Effectiveness of early treatment of Class II malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2002;121(1):9–17.
5.
Flores-Mir C, PaulWMajor. Cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the Twin blok appliance in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients. A systematic review. 2006;76(5):876–81.
6.
Bj rk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 1983;5(1):1–46.
7.
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2003;124(3):234–43.
8.
Veitz-Keenan A, Liu N. One phase or two phases orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion? Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2019;20(2):56–7.
9.
AG. P, S.J.J. Orthopedically-induced growth-stimulating effecton human mandibule: new approach to decision - making. 1997;2:73–90.
10.
Mossey PA. The Heritability of Malocclusion: Part 2. The Influence of Genetics in Malocclusion. British Journal of Orthodontics. 1999;26(3):195–203.
11.
Marković M. Ortodoncija I izdanje. 1982.
12.
Proffit WR, a. Contemporary orthodontics. 1993.
13.
Pfeiffer JP, Grobéty D. The Class II malocclusion: Differential diagnosis and clinical application of activators, extraoral traction, and fixed appliances. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1975;68(5):499–544.
14.
Haupl KUS, ZB WL. 1949;2.
15.
Kaur H, Pavithra U, Abraham R. Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in South Indian population. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2013;3(2):97.
16.
Tod MA, A.A. Taverne Prevalence of malocclusion traits in an Australian adult population. 1997;15(1):16–22.
17.
Homan BT, Davies GN. An oral health survey of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders in far North Queensland*. Australian Dental Journal. 1973;18(2):75–87.
18.
Barmes D. Dental and natural survey of primitive people in Central Africa. 1993;38:367–72.
19.
de Muνiz BR. Epidemiology of malocclusion in Argentine children. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1986;14(4):221–4.
20.
Helm S. Orthodontic treatment priorities in the Danish Child Dental Health Services. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1982;10(5):260–3.
21.
THILANDER B, MYRBERG N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1973;81(1):12–20.
22.
Brunelle JA, Bhat M, Lipton JA. Prevalence and Distribution of Selected Occlusal Characteristics in the US Population, 1988–1991. Journal of Dental Research. 1996;75(2_suppl):706–13.
23.
Sharma A, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya B. Skeletal and Dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in Class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: A cephalometric study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2012;30(3):218.
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
Google scholar:
See link
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
