Piriformis: Sparing approach, is it better?

Korica Stefan ,
Korica Stefan
Ivana Glišović-Jovanović ,
Ivana Glišović-Jovanović
Uroš Moljević ,
Uroš Moljević
Dejan Tabaković ,
Dejan Tabaković
Dejan Virijević ,
Dejan Virijević
Slađana Matić ,
Slađana Matić
Marko Kadija
Marko Kadija

Published: 01.12.2020.

Volume 50, Issue 3 (2021)

pp. 31-34;

https://doi.org/10.5937/pramed2104031k

Abstract

Hip fractures as well as coxarthrosis are conditions that are becoming more common in everyday orthopedic practice. With the aging of the world's population, there is an increasing need for partial (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). No elective procedure is as important to quality of life as total hip arthroplasty, and partial hip arthroplasty is a method of treatment in elder population who suffered fracture of the femoral neck. There are several hip approaches that can be used for arthroplasty. Hip dislocation is a serious complication after hip arthroplasty and occurs somewhat more frequently when the posterior hip approach is used. The aim of this study is to show that the piriformis sparing technique gives better results in terms of reducing the frequency of dislocations in the early postoperative period (one year). We operated od 249 patients, and after follow-up that lasted from 13 to 22 months we had four dislocations, three in patient with THA(0.021) and one after HA(0.009). Preservation of the piriformis tendon is a minor modification in the operative technique that can lead to a great benefit in the quality of treatment and a reduced risk of complications.

Keywords

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by